Johns Hopkins Pulls BOMBSHELL Article Because It Destroys The Pandemic Narrative

November 26, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

On November 22, 2020 Johns Hopkins Newsletter published an article by Yanni Gu titled A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19. In this article stat experts declared: “These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

Within a few days the powers that be were quick to scrub the article from their website so as to suppress this incredible truth and keep the public believing we are in the midst of a “pandemic.” This is HUGE news that must be shared. Fortunately it can still be found in web archives as follows:

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

By YANNI GU | November 22, 2020  



After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September.

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States. 

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared. 

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. 

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. 

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception? 

To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.

Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

“This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand pointed out.

When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND Graph depicts the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018.

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND  Graph depicts the total decrease in deaths by various causes, including COVID-19.  

The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.

In an interview with The News-Letter, Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.

In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes. Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say, in Briand’s view, that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.

Briand also mentioned that more research and data are needed to truly decipher the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States.

Throughout the talk, Briand constantly emphasized that although COVID-19 is a serious national and global problem, she also stressed that society should never lose focus of the bigger picture — death in general. 

The death of a loved one, from COVID-19 or from other causes, is always tragic, Briand explained. Each life is equally important and we should be reminded that even during a global pandemic we should not forget about the tragic loss of lives from other causes.

According to Briand, the over-exaggeration of the COVID-19 death number may be due to the constant emphasis on COVID-19-related deaths and the habitual overlooking of deaths by other natural causes in society. 

During an interview with The News-Letter after the event, Poorna Dharmasena, a master’s candidate in Applied Economics, expressed his opinion about Briand’s concluding remarks.

“At the end of the day, it’s still a deadly virus. And over-exaggeration or not, to a certain degree, is irrelevant,” Dharmasena said.

When asked whether the public should be informed about this exaggeration in death numbers, Dharmasena stated that people have a right to know the truth. However, COVID-19 should still continuously be treated as a deadly disease to safeguard the vulnerable population.

More Bombshell News You Won’t Find In the Mainstream Media!


Breaking News: PCR Test Found Unreliable


Portuguese Court of Appeal considers PCR tests unreliable and lifts quarantine

Here the judgment can be found. Due to lack of language skills, reference is made to the presentation and interpretation of the judgment on , where the tenor is quoted as follows:
acórdão citius.pdf

Portugiesisches Berufungsgericht hält PCR-Tests für unzuverlässig und he…An den PCR Tests, die auf eine Veröffentlichung des deutschen Virologen Christian Drosten zurückzuführen und vom…

 ” Based on the currently available scientific evidence, this test is [the RT-PCR test] in and of itself is not able to unambiguously determine whether the positivity actually corresponds to an infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, for several reasons, two of which are paramount: the reliability of the test depends on the number of cycles used; the reliability of the test depends on the viral load present.

With reference to Jaafar et al. (2020; the court concludes that “if a person tests positive by PCR, if a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as described in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the likelihood that this person is infected is <3% and the likelihood that the result will be a false positive is 97% “. The court also notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being carried out in Portugal is unknown.

With reference to Surkova et al. (2020;–7/fulltext ) the court further states that every diagnostic test must be interpreted in the context of the actual probability of illness, as assessed prior to performing the test itself, and expresses the opinion that “In the current epidemiological landscape, the likelihood of Covid-19 tests giving false positive results is increasing, with significant implications for individuals, the health system and society Has”.

The court’s summary for ruling against the regional health authority’s appeal reads as follows:

“Given the scientific doubts expressed by experts, ie, those who play a role, about the reliability of the PCR tests, the lack of information on the analytical parameters of the tests and the lack of a medical diagnosis as to the presence of an infection or an infection risk occupied, this test can never tell if C actually was a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or whether A, B and D were at high risk. ” “

Update : A reader contributed this translation , thank you!

Update: And someone found these sources:–7t8pdl-l1‑3/

It’s all falling apart. One by one the dominoes will fall and at the end will be freedom for humanity. Never lose hope.

Costco Announces They Intend To Violate Federal Law And Are Happy To Discriminate

November 14, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

“Effective Nov. 16, 2020, we will require all members, guests and employees to wear a face mask or face shield at Costco locations,” Costco’s president and chief executive officer, Craig Jelinek, wrote in a statement yesterday.

A mask requirement has been in place at all Costco stores since May 4. However, those with a medical condition were previously exempt from the rule.

“This [exemption] is no longer the case. If a member has a medical condition that prevents them from wearing a mask, they must wear a face shield at Costco,” Jelinek said.

Apparently Mr. Jelinek doesn’t seem to realize that some of these medical exemptions are for psychological issues that prevent the placement of any type of restrictive device being forced on or around their face.

And apparently he also seems to think he has the authority to violate Federal Laws which protect those with disabilities from being discriminated against, while also ignoring the rules laid out by the Governor. I know in my state our Governor has declared that those with a medical condition are exempt from wearing a face covering. It doesn’t say “unless that face covering is a plastic shield.”

The truth of it is this: medical exemption or not – you do NOT have to wear a face diaper to shop at Costco, or anywhere for that matter!

When you enter into a grocery store or any business and someone asks you where your face mask is ask them why they expect you to wear one. Here are the possible replies and the coinciding answer you should give:

“To prevent the spread of Covid-19 and keep our other customers safe.” To which you respond…

“Can I see the physicians affidavit to confirm that I am in fact a threat to public safety? Unless there is a medical assessment done by a medical professional that has been sworn by affidavit to affirm that I am carrying a communicable disease, and that affidavit has been given to a Health Official who then obtains a court order for me to be isolated, I am not a direct threat.”

“You have to wear one because it’s our store policy.” To which you reply…

“Your store policy cannot override my federally protected rights. You cannot enforce a store policy that is against the LAW.”

“It’s the law.” To which you reply…

“No, actually it’s not the LAW. The LAW is the Constitution, which protects my right to speak freely and obtain LIFE-giving oxygen without obstruction. The LAW is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which outlaws discrimination and allows for equal access to goods and services. There is no LAW which declares I must conceal my identity in order to shop. Can you show me the statute?”

“It’s for your health and safety and the safety of others.” To which you reply…

“Can I see your license to practice medicine? Are you a doctor? Are you my doctor? My doctor has advised against me wearing a mask or anything on my face. Did you know it is against the law to practice medicine without a license?”

When they are unable to answer your questions you then proceed to go about your shopping. If they try to block you from entering, advise them that they are committing a crime known as false imprisonment.

Just the act of harassment alone, even if only verbal, is considered assault. If they lay a finger on you it then becomes battery. Be sure to document the entire experience.

If they refuse to let you pass after advising them of the laws they are breaking you may choose to leave before the police are called but be sure to record the names of those involved and the time of the incident, as well as the details, for later reference.

Now you have a CAUSE OF ACTION for a Civil Complaint. You can then ask a court for an injunction to prevent Costco (or any other store) from violating your rights again or causing you continued harm by drafting and filing a “Complaint for Declaratory and Emergency Injunctive Relief”.

Even if you do NOT engage in any of this dialogue YOU STILL HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION! The moment they refuse you entry even though you are a paying member they have committed the crime of harassment. You can turn around and leave right there and still follow through with the next steps. Be sure to watch the video below!

The only way that we are going to win this fight is if the people get BRAVE, GET EDUCATED and STAND UP! You don’t need a lawyer! You just need motivation. Our future is at stake. It is time to make our legal system work for us! It is time to take back our FREEDOM.

My latest rant on BitChute:

How The CDC Has Created The Illusion of Excess Deaths From Covid-19

November 9, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

It has been eight months since Covid-19 began it’s reign of terror in America, quickly becoming a household name. In order for governments to continue their “mitigation” tactics, relentlessly subverting the will of the people and depriving them of their Constitutional rights, there must be a continued state of emergency in order to justify these draconian policies.

The single most important deciding factor in calling for a continued state of emergency is the PERCEPTION that one exists. How exactly does one determine this state of emergency when hospitals remain operating at normal capacity and evidence of widespread death remains unseen?

By manipulating statistical data to create the illusion of excess death.

Misreporting In The Last Three Years Has Lead to Questionable Estimates

If you look at the data from The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for death totals from 1999-2018 you can see that The CDC reports the total deaths increased in large amounts from 2009 to 2016 and then suddenly stopped increasing in 2018 and 2019.

Underlying Cause of Death, 1999-2018 Results

Data for 2019 is obtainable here (click “Downloads” then “Download data”; the total deaths for 2019 was determined by adding column “K” from rows 119 to 170 which are data for weeks 1-52 of 2019).

That gives you a total of 2,845,796 for 2019.

As you can see 2017, 2018 and 2019 totals are nearly identical which makes no sense considering from 2010 to 2016, the number of deaths increased by 275,813. Given the data on hand one should estimate deaths in the U.S. to increase by 275,000 every six years or so. But suddenly come 2018 that increase completely halts.

Using this incredibly questionable data we arrive at an expected death count for the year 2020 that is actually lower than that for 2019. The CDC has taken the death count from 2017, 2018 and 2019 and added them up to get an average of 2,832,835.

Anything over this number can now be attributed to Covid-19.

According to the data from the CDC found above from 1999 to 2010 the number of deaths per year stayed relatively constant from approximately 2,390,000 to 2,470,000 deaths per year while the total U.S. population increased by about 30 million people.

Since 2010, though, deaths per year have reportedly increased by about 400,000 per year compared to 2009, while up to 2018 the CDC estimated the population only increased by 20 million people. This presents a serious question: is there a huge increase in death in those years or a discrepancy in data collection for total population?

Census takers say they were told to enter false information

In a Fox News article released on November 8, 2020 two census takers told The Associated Press that their supervisors pressured them to enter false information into a computer system about homes they had not visited so they could close cases ahead of their deadline.

Census workers, Pam Roberts of Indiana and Maria Arce of Massachusetts, both blew the whistle on their supervisors and exposed that they were instructed to make up answers about households where no one was home.

The Fox News article reads:

“The census takers shared their experiences with the AP as a coalition of local governments and advocacy groups wages a battle in federal court over the accuracy of the 2020 census. A lawsuit filed in California challenged the decision by the Commerce Department, which oversees the Census Bureau, to speed up deadlines so that the count would end in September.

The coalition argued that the shortened timeline would cause minority communities to be undercounted in the data used to determine the number of congressional seats in each state.

A judge ruled that the count could continue through the end of October and that census officials could continue crunching the numbers through April 2021. But the Trump administration appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sided with the administration and allowed census field operations to end in mid-October. An appellate court suspended the judge’s order on the deadline for the numbers to be used for congressional representation. That issue is still being litigated.”

My theory in all of this is a deliberate skewing of the numbers not only for political purposes but for even more falsified data to be used as we embark on a new year of pandemic hell with the coming Covid-21.

We all know that the CDC has been colluding with The World Health Organization, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank and World Economic Forum to maintain a stranglehold on the world population long enough to roll out the Great Reset, the Digital Dollar and the nanotechnology laced Covid Vaccine for a new world order dystopian surveillance state that the masses will call the “New Normal.”

It’s clear to see how easy it is to maintain control over the perception of the masses when you can control how data is collected and used.

Check out my video on this…

Thanks for subscribing!

Dr. Fauci’s Own Words Destroy The COVID-19 Narrative

November 7, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Listen to the EXPERTS!

Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), has been touted as one of the leading experts concerning the coronavirus pandemic, and has stood at the forefront of Covid-19 policy in America, yet this very same expert is also the same guy who has directly contradicted his own stance on more than one occasion.

Experts have known Covid-19 is not a pandemic since February, 2020

While lay people, politicians, and judges have been left helpless and at the mercy of health experts claiming “we just don’t know enough” during the first lockdown phase of Covid-19 disease, we are too far along now and have learned more than enough about the Covid-19 disease to allow the same set of health experts to hoodwink us into a second round of unjustified  rights violations. 

Based on preliminary data out of China, as early as February, 2020, public health officials Anthony Fauci and Robert Redfield, heads of the NIAID and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), respectively, and current members of the Presidential Task Force on Coronavirus, acknowledged that Covid-19 was probably not as deadly of a virus as first thought and may end up being close to the seasonal flu in number of deaths and number of people infected (scientists use these two numbers — number of deaths and number of people infected — to calculate something called the “mortality rate” or “case fatality rate” of a virus, which is the single most important number in determining whether a virus qualifies as a public health emergency). 

On February 28, 2020, Fauci and Redfield wrote in an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine:  

“The case fatality rate (of Covid-19) may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”

Neither Fauci nor Redfield have retracted nor modified this prediction about Covid-19 in any official manner since February, 2020, and most scientific data since the publication of this article have verified that Covid-19 is akin to the seasonal flu in mortality rate. 

There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci told 60 Minutes on March 8, 2020.

In an interview with Dr. Jon LaPook on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Dr. Fauci claimed that people should not be wearing a mask unless you are infected, yet later on he was quoted as saying that “everyone” must wear a mask to slow the spread of coronavirus and that state and local leaders should be “as forceful as possible” to get the public to wear masks.

So, which is it Mr. Expert? Seems like that depends on what direction the agenda is heading.

Bombshell: Fauci States COVID Test Has Fatal Flaw

In a July 16, 2020 podcast called “This Week in Virology” Dr. Anthony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID-19 test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Starting at about the 4-minute mark Dr. Fauci says:

“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more… the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule… you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

What Fauci failed to say in the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles and not 35.

Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud.

Page 35

When your country’s leading health expert can’t even keep his story straight it’s safe to say that it’s probably time to start looking elsewhere for answers. Let’s not forget that Anthony Fauci also has a vested interest in the coming vaccine campaign and holds a position on the Global Vaccine Action Plan developed by none other than Bill and Melinda Gates. Read my previous article Covid-19 Is The Litmus Test to learn more about the truth about Covid-19 and those behind the deception.

The Flu Suddenly Vanishes in 2020

November 4, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

While ‘confirmed cases’ of Covid-19 continue to rise, an interesting bit of data has surfaced in regards to the seasonal flu. Apparently the flu no longer exists as long as Covid-19 is ruling the testing scene. While some are saying this is the result of universal masking and social distancing measures, there is no actual proof of that and instead this notion is based merely on correlation. If the masking and social distancing actually worked to prevent the spread of any influenza like illness (ILI) wouldn’t it also have stopped the spread of Covid-19 as well?

The reason why we continue to see an increase in Covid-19 while the flu has all but vanished is simple: the flu is no longer being tested for because health care providers are automatically going to look for Covid-19 instead. And of course they are going to find it. If they had tested for the flu they would have found that instead. It’s all about the PCR test and it’s inability to decipher a true positive for any virus it is intended to detect.

Add to that the fact that Covid-19 diagnoses are being made in many cases based on symptoms alone and it’s not at all surprising.

‘Surveillance’ data collected by the World Health Organization (WHO) shows that as Covid-19 came on the scene towards the end of March the number of reported flu cases all but disappeared.

In Australia, just 14 positive flu cases were recorded in April, compared with 367 during the same month in 2019 – a 96 per cent drop. By June, usually the peak of its flu season, there were none. In fact, Australia has not reported a positive case to the WHO since July.

In Chile, just 12 cases of flu were detected between April and October. There were nearly 7,000 during the same period in 2019. 

In the UK, since Covid-19 began spreading in March, just 767 cases have been reported to the WHO compared with nearly 7,000 from March to October last year. 

And in South Africa, surveillance tests picked up just two cases at the beginning of the season, which quickly dropped to zero over the following month – overall, a 99 per cent drop compared with the previous year.

While some hold on to the theory that this is the result of what’s known as ‘viral interference’ where one virus ‘crowds out’ another preventing infection, most of the so called experts are choosing instead to claim that the only reasonable explanation is that the masking and social distancing, as well as school and business closures, actually work. This deduction however is not based on any significant statistical data and instead is based on a need to make sense of the situation without admitting that the method of diagnosis for Covid-19 is fundamentally flawed and thatb this entire fiasco is a fraud.

Concerning the use of PCR testing, the Centers for Disease Control(CDC) has revealed that, “Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.” This means a positive test doesn’t guarantee that the Covid-19 virus is causing infection at all and the virus might not be in the patient’s body whatsoever. The WHO has also told us that, “Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”

The PCR is testing for a specific RNA sequence not the full viral genome, so even if it accurately detects that RNA sequence, there is no proof that RNA sequence is from SARS-CoV-2, as it could be from another virus, microorganism or even part of your own human gene sequence. Since the PCR test is only able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times to then manufacture what it is looking for the test should not be used for diagnosis. The inventor of the test, Kary Mullis, specifically pointed this out and this is also why he has called the test an ‘oxymoron’ in relation to it’s use as a quantitative test. It cannot distinguish between a live virus and dead particles.

Because of these facts you can have someone who has the flu, be tested for Covid-19 and wind up with a positive test. Take into account the fact that CDC guidance for diagnosis also calls for a Covid-19 label based on mere suspicion alone, without the need for laboratory testing, and it becomes quite clear that what we have here is a mislabeling of illness.