Meta Analysis of 54 Studies Shows Asymptomatic Spread is FALSE

December 29, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

The mass majority of the population appears to be in a hypnotic state. They have been told they must “stay home to save lives” and are much better off sitting in front of their television than to be out spreading disease. Doesn’t matter of course that they are healthy: enter the “asymptomatic carrier”.

Entire economies have been completely obliterated thanks to this unfounded, nonsensical, unscientific and unproven THEORY. Family members no longer hug each other and small talk in grocery lines has become a thing of the past. Even just a friendly smile is no longer safe, or even worth the effort since no one can see each other’s faces anyway.

And this is the New Normal.

A place where being human is far too dangerous thanks to the fear propaganda fueling the concept of asymptomatic spread.

Yet all of this fear that perfectly healthy people can be spreading disease has never once been proven true and our very own experts including Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, and Dr. Fauci himself have both said that asymptomatic spread is rare, and not the driver of an outbreak.

Now a new study published on December 14, 2020 in the Journals of The American Medical Association confirms what many of us have known from the very beginning: the idea of asymptomatic spread is FALSE. The use of this concept has largely been implemented as a method of control and an instrument for global economic destruction while keeping the masses easily manipulated through fear.

In this recent publication, meta analysis of 54 studies with 77,758 participants showed that the rate of asymptomatic and presymptomatic index cases was 0.7% (95% CI 0%-4.9%).

The asymptomatic/presymptomatic secondary attack rate is not statistically different from zero, and the confidence interval is technically 0.7 ± 4.2, resulting in a range of -3.5%-4.9%, but attack rates cannot be negative, so it is truncated at 0.


Just like the other studies we have seen which also found exactly ZERO incidence of secondary infection from asymptomatic individuals.

Back in May there was a study out of China that looked at 455 contacts who had been exposed to a patient in a hospital who tested positive but showed no symptoms. Not one of the 455 contacts tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.


In November of 2020 another study done in Wuhan, China was published involving nearly 10 million participants. In this study NOT ONE positive test result came from the 1,174 contacts who were exposed to asymptomatic carriers.


Please subscribe to my Bit Chute Channel as well! I don’t see myself being on You Tube much longer!

“We would really like to see the data, because if there is asymptomatic transmission, it really impacts the policies regarding screening, etc. But the one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaksThe driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci

Right from the horses mouth.

And yet the masking and the lockdowns and the quarantines continue. How much longer are we going to keep playing this game? When will the truth bear any weight on the decisions around policies? When will the politicians start representing the people instead of the stakeholders and lobbyists?

When will the hypnotized masses awaken to the grand deception and demand an end to this insanity? Only if they turn off their television…then we may stand a chance.


Finally: WHO Admits There is a Problem With The PCR Test

December 19, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Scientists have known for some time that there are serious flaws when it comes to using the RT-PCR test to detect a virus. Questions around it’s accuracy since as far back as the AIDS epidemic prove that those in the know have been in the know since before this Plandemic began.

In 2007 a New York Times article titled, “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t” detailed how a Whooping Cough “epidemic” turned out to be a “false alarm” due to faith in the “highly sensitive molecular test” being used to look for pertussis among healthcare workers that were falling ill. Further lab results revealed otherwise and Gina Kolata wrote, “it appears the health care workers probably were afflicted with ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.”

This is the same situation found today with the PCR test, which has been touted as the “Gold Standard” in which to detect SARS-CoV2, but simply cannot be considered reliable in determining the presence of any live virus because the process of amplification can result in any number of viral particles, dead or alive, producing a positive result not indicative of infection.

On December 14, 2020 the World Health Organization finally issued a notice revealing a “problem” with the RT-PCR test to be considered by health care workers. The notice reports:

WHO has received user feedback on an elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results when testing specimens using RT-PCR reagents on open systems.  

Leading to a call for healthcare workers to determine whether an adjustment in Cycle Threshold may be necessary:

to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.

This is exactly what has been said over and again by many experts, including Dr. Anthony Fauci himself: A Ct value above 35 cycles can result in a positive test from an amplification of particles that have absolutely nothing to do with SARS-CoV2.

The notice goes on to say…

[W]hen specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain. Thus, the IFU will state how to interpret specimens at or near the limit for PCR positivity. In some cases, the IFU will state that the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise.

This goes right along with what the inventor of the test himself had said as well: that the PCR test was not designed for and should not be used for diagnosis. Yet here we are, basing every economic policy and all regulations around returning to a “normal” life on the number of “confirmed” cases.

It is nothing less than criminal to have known all along the serious flaws in the PCR test and continue to use it to make life and death decisions that will have a lasting effect on us all.

The real question is: what will we do with this admission by the World Health Organization? Will there be a significant change in the course of this insanity train? Or will we just ignore this FACT just like the 1.4% Infection Fatality Rate and the WHO guidance that mask wearing should be reserved for those who are sick?

WHO is really calling the shots?

Thanks for subscribing!

Fool Me Once…

No “Normalcy” on The Horizon Even With a Vaccine

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks during a news conference in the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2020.
Chris Kleponis | Bloomberg | Getty Images

December 17, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Covid-19 continues to dominate the headlines and there seems to be no end in sight to the continued media frenzy over “confirmed cases”. What the media fails to report on as usual is the declining death rate and the the fact that total deaths for the year are not far off from the average.

But that’s to be expected, of course, if you are trying to maintain the heightened sense of threat needed to induce a fear driven consent to continued tyranny for the sake of “safety”.

By the summer of 2020 talking heads in governments worldwide were parroting the adage that things cannot go “back normal until we have a vaccine.”

Yet, here we are six months later, and as the Pfizer vaccine is making it’s way into healthcare settings for distribution in the U.S and elsewhere, we have people like Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health associate Amy Hobbs declaring that “wearing a mask will become part of my daily life, moving forward, even after a vaccine is deployed.”

Flip flopping on the story has been the common theme among the experts and now once again we have our favorite expert Dr. Anthony Fauci, Head of The National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, going from warning us of the dangers in continued economic and social lockdown back in spring to letting us know (without any real explanation) that any chance of a return to normal is not expected until fall of 2021 at the earliest.

Another one of our favorite Fauci quotes was recorded during a 60 Minutes interview with Dr. Jon LaPook where he avowed that “people should not be walking around in masks”, and while many have assumed that the mask wearing would end once a vaccine hit the scenes, we now have our favorite double speaking health expert declaring:

“Obviously, with a 90-plus percent effective vaccine, you could feel much more confident” about not getting the virus, Fauci told Tapper. “But I would recommend to people to not abandon all public health measures just because you have been vaccinated.” Those fundamentals include: universal wearing of masks, maintaining physical distance, avoiding large crowds, doing more outdoor activities and washing hands frequently.

Because “even though, for the general population, it might be 90[%] to 95% effective,” said Fauci, “you don’t necessarily know, for you, how effective it is.” Even at those success rates, about 5% to 10% of people immunized may still get the virus.

Sadly, the majority of the unsuspecting public remains completely oblivious of the constant use of promises of TEMPORARY restrictions to elicit consent to a long term agenda. By the time they realize they’ve been fooled it’s already too late.

The methodical deconstruction of the current system is already well under way and most have found a certain comfort in their compliance as they quickly forget that it was supposed to be two weeks to flatten the curve.

It only takes about two months for a certain behavior to become habit, and the ruling class know this. They have spent many decades perfecting the manipulation of human psychology in order to get us to this place.

So, now here we are nearly a year after this all began and while many were fine with forfeiting their constitutional rights temporarily in order to allow governments to “save lives” they have easily become transformed into obedient, unthinking lemmings that keep falling for the next carrot on a stick.

The next carrot on a stick to move this agenda where they want it to go will be a financial incentive to get vaccinated, and they will be sure the people are good and broke before they offer it up.

Former congressman John Delaney has proposed a very clever way to reach this goal to vaccinate 70% of the population: a $1,500 stimulus check for those agreeing to take the untested, rushed into production, liability exempt Covid-19 vaccine.

Of course vaccine stakeholders and fascist dictators alike boast this is a most benevolent strategy designed to save the economy and lives in one clean sweep. Of course those who see beyond the promises and lies know the intent is the exact opposite, perfectly packaged for the believers.

Fool me twice…

Health Impact News:

“Stay of Action” Filed Against FDA to STOP Approval of COVID Vaccine for Using Faulty PCR Tests in Trials

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

An ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION has been filed with the Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the new Pfizer COVID vaccine that has been submitted for “emergency use authorization” (EUA).

It is widely expected that the FDA is going to grant EUA fast-track approval to Pfizer’s experimental COVID vaccine within days.

The STAY OF ACTION is a Petition for Administrative Action Regarding Confirmation of Efficacy End Points of Phase III Clinical Trials of COVID19 Vaccines.

The STAY OF ACTION is based upon the faulty PCR tests that were used in the vaccine trials:

Before an EUA or unrestricted license is issued for the Pfizer vaccine, or for other vaccines for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection, all “endpoints” or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by Sanger sequencing, given the high cycle thresholds used in some trials. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee

The Petitioner of this ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION is Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist and founder of Milford Molecular Diagnostics, a CLIA-certified diagnostic laboratory in Milford, Connecticut.

Dr. Lee is a world-renowned expert on DNA sequencing-based diagnostics. He has trained and taught in some of the world’s most prestigious institutions and has published scores of scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals.

He recognized very early on that the PCR tests and other tests fast-tracked by the FDA were not accurate in identifying SARSCoV-2 RNA, and even sent a letter, back in March, to Dr. Margaret Harris and Dr. Eduardo Guerrero of the World Health Organization, and Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), explaining why the tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA were generating false positives and negatives.

You can read his March 22, 2020 letter here. He explained that a two-phased test would “guarantee no-false positive results” based on his research and published work from Japan.

According to Attorney Mary Holland of Children’s Health Defense, he never received a reply from the WHO or the NIH. To this day, they continue to use faulty tests to identify COVID.

So here we are now at the end of November, 2020, and the FDA appears to be ready to grant EUA fast-track approval to COVID vaccines that have gone through Phase I, II, and III vaccine trials, all using these faulty COVID tests.

In Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION, he recognizes the great risk for harm on the American public if the vaccine trials are approved based on these faulty tests.

Petitioner and the public will suffer irreparable harm if the actions requested herein are not granted, because once the FDA licenses this COVID-19 vaccine, both governments and employers may make this product mandatory (in general, or for airline or international travel) or may recommend it for widespread use.

If the assignment of cases and non-cases during the course of the trial is not accurate, the vaccine will not have been properly tested. If the vaccine is not properly tested, important public policy decisions regarding its use will be based on misleading evidence. The medical and economic consequences to the nation could hardly be higher.

The New York State Bar Association has already issued a report on COVID-19 recommending that, “a vaccine subject to scientific evidence of safety and efficacy be made widely available, and widely encouraged, and if the public health authorities conclude necessary, required…”

Thus, it is reasonable to suspect that COVID-19 vaccines, including the Pfizer vaccine, could become mandatory. Without the FDA assuring proper efficacy trials of the vaccine now, the Petitioner and the public may not have the opportunity to object to receiving the vaccine, which was approved based on currently deficient and unreliable clinical trial data.

How likely is it that HHS and the FDA will grant this stay and deal with the PCR testing deficiencies before issuing emergency use fast-track approval to the Pfizer vaccine?

Not very likely at all, unless the public puts pressure on them to be more transparent and deal with these testing deficiencies, that top scientists all around the world now are speaking out against. See:

“Pandemic is Over” – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says “Second Wave” Faked On False-Positive COVID Tests

German Lawsuit Against “FactCheckers” Will Force Them To Prove Legitimacy of COVID Tests

Dr. Peter Marks is the head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, and will be the main person to make the decision of whether or not to issue an EUA for the Pfizer COVID vaccine. He recently told the press that “Americans can expect a very open process” in their evaluation of the experimental vaccine. (Source.)

We need thousands if not tens of thousands of Americans to contact Dr. Peter Marks and let him know the public is watching, and that we want the FDA to consider Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION and respond to it.

Here is Dr. Marks’ public contact info:

Dr. Peter Marks – email: – Phone: 240-402-8116

Here is FDA Director Dr. Stephen Hahn’s contact info:

Dr. Stephen Hahn – email: – Phone (Main FDA #): 1-888-463-6332 – Twitter account: @SteveFDA

A Strong Warning to the U.S. Military about Operation Warp Speed


War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg and the “Doctors Trial.” Adolf Hitler’s personal physician, 43-year old Karl Brandt. Brandt was also Reich Commissar for Health and Sanitation, and was indicted by the U.S. prosecution with 22 other Nazi doctors. Brandt was found guilty of participating in and consenting to using concentration camp inmates as guinea pigs in horrible medical experiments, supposedly for the benefit of the armed forces. He was sentenced to death by hanging along with 6 other doctors who received death sentences. Image Source.

If you are a member of the military who will soon be called upon to participate in Operation Warp Speed and help distribute the new experimental COVID vaccine, be careful that you do not end up on the wrong side of history!

Just claiming to be “following orders” if massive deaths and injuries result from this experimental vaccine may not save you!

That is what many of the Nazi doctors in Germany who served under Hitler tried to claim, but during the Nuremberg trials, and specifically the “Doctors Trial” in 1946-1947, twenty of the twenty-three defendants were medical doctors, and were accused of having been involved in Nazi human experimentation and mass murder.

Of the 23 defendants, seven were acquitted and seven received death sentences; the remainder received prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment.

What they did under German law, or maybe “emergency orders” during war time, was probably perfectly “legal” at the time, but after the Hitler regime was overthrown those who committed these “legal” actions that resulted in murder and crimes against humanity, were brought to justice after the war.

Dr. Peter Marks and Dr. Stephen Hahn would also do well to just not blindly excuse Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION, because Dr. Lee appears to have close ties to Attorney Mary Holland, currently the Counsel for Children’s Health Defense and former Professor of Law at NYU, and one of the nation’s top attorneys when it comes to vaccines.

Mary Holland works now for Attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who himself has become one the top attorneys in the world taking on Big Pharma.

He currently has 4 lawsuits filed against pharmaceutical giant Merck, for their approval of the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, which has destroyed the lives of so many young people due to being fast-tracked into the market.

The work of Dr. Sin Hang Lee and his DNA sequencing-based diagnostic testing on the HPV Gardasil vaccine found DNA fragments in the vaccine, something that Merck and the FDA had denied. See:

Fighting Academic Censorship on Gardasil Vaccine Research, Dr. Sin Hang Lee Challenges Medical and Scientific Community to Debate in Open Forum

His work in identifying these problems with the Gardasil vaccine led Japan to stop recommending the vaccine as part of their national vaccination program.

Here is a warning from a former Military Commander regarding current Commanders taking part of Operation Warp Speed, and the legal risks of doing so, published at Children’s Health Defense.

Former Officer Warns Military of Pitfalls Surrounding COVID Vaccine Mandate

Fast tracking the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for a probable military mandate creates unparalleled dilemma for commanders who will face prodigious legal, medical, safety and ethical questions.

By Pam Long
Children’s Health Defense

As the former commanding officer of the Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment of the 36th Medical Evacuation Battalion, I recommend urgent caution for military commanders with orders to have all soldiers vaccinated with the experimental SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

My concerns include the legality of a mandate, lack of treatment protocols and surveillance for adverse reactions, and a research-based risk assessment.

Legal challenges to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mandate

Under Emergency Use Authorization, state governments cannot mandate the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the civilian sector. A military mandate would require demonstration that the military sector had a compelling justification for a mandate. Healthy, young service members are not an at-risk group as they are not obese, not over the age of 65 and do not have comorbidities that cause complications from respiratory diseases.

The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine currently is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Even with a pending warp-speed FDA approval in the next month, the military, which still hasn’t rectified the failures, summarized here, of its Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP) isn’t in a position to implement a safe SARS-CoV-2 program. The Pfizer and Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, both of which use new mRNA technology, have much more potential for reactogenicity than the anthrax vaccine.

In short, federal courts have set precedent that mandating experimental vaccines in the military is illegal. As I wrote in a previous article:

“In 2008, the federal court affirmed that the FDA, [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] HHS and [Department of Defense] DOD allowed an illegal AVIP program by mandating an experimental anthrax vaccine for military personnel that was not licensed for use against inhalation anthrax, nor approved for use by a presidential waiver.”

The illegal anthrax vaccine mandate caused adverse health outcomes in thousands of service members, triggered a retention crisis among pilots and imposed disciplinary actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice against service members who refused an experimental and highly reactogenic vaccine.

All of these outcomes are likely to reoccur under a SARS-CoV-2 mandate. The HHS distribution plan will allow for millions of people to take the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within a short period of time before any signals of adverse reactions are identified.

A military mandate would also have to demonstrate compelling reason to remove the right of service members to vaccine exemption by confirming with blood titers testing that they have antibody immunity.

Virologists at the La Jolla Institute of Immunology reported to the New York Times in November 2020 regarding coronavirus:

“Eight months after infection, most people who have recovered still have enough immune cells to fend off the virus and prevent illness, the new data show. A slow rate of decline in the short term suggests, happily, that these cells may persist in the body for a very, very long time to come.”

The researchers reported that natural immunity can last years.

Policy on treatment protocols and surveillance for adverse reactions

Commanders should reject any plan to mass vaccinate service members with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine without an active surveillance policy in writing to review.

That policy should include a phased roll-out of the vaccine, a screening form for contraindications, vaccine exemptions (for medical contraindication, religious and personal belief accommodations, and those who are immune), education for service members on how to report adverse reactions to the Defense Medical Surveillance System, and training for medical providers on safe vaccine storage along with treatment protocols for adverse reactions.

The lack of established treatment protocols for immune backfiring known as Antibody Dependent Enhancement, when antibodies enhance uptake of the virus instead of neutralizing, should set off alarms for this entire mRNA vaccine program.

Review of the research-based risk assessment

Commanders should demand to see a research-based risk assessment from DOD on the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. This risk assessment should be compared to the alternative “no vaccine mandate” course of action for a virus with a 99.9% survival rate.

Some of the hazards previously identified in mRNA animal research include liver damage in ferretsenhanced respiratory disease in mice and ADE lung damage in monkeys. Furthermore, service members of child-producing ages, both male and female, should be informed that developmental and reproductive toxicity has not been established in this vaccine.

Since the U.S. has sidestepped identifying mitigating controls in animal trials for COVID vaccines, then the research implores that all humans should be screened for potential vaccine-induced autoimmunity, and health providers to be prepared for both excessive swelling and pathological clotting.

Safety precautions, as outlined in the study “mRNA Vaccines — a New Era in Vaccinology,” include:

“However, recent human trials have demonstrated moderate and in rare cases severe injection site or systemic reactions for different mRNA platforms. Potential safety concerns that are likely to be evaluated in future preclinical and clinical studies include local and systemic inflammation, the biodistribution and persistence of expressed immunogen, stimulation of auto-reactive antibodies and potential toxic effects of any non-native nucleotides and delivery system components.

A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity.

Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken.

Another potential safety issue could derive from the presence of extracellular RNA during mRNA vaccination. Extracellular naked RNA has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may thus contribute to oedema. Another study showed that extracellular RNA promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation.

Safety will therefore need continued evaluation as different mRNA modalities and delivery systems are utilized for the first time in humans and are tested in larger patient populations.”

Medical ethics require patients’ informed consent in treatment 

Given that the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is designed to reduce symptoms and not to prevent infection or transmission, the military lacks a compelling justification for a vaccine mandate for members who are not at risk of virus complications.

This virus does not pose the fatality risks of anthrax or smallpox biological weapons in 2001. There has not been an “imminent risk” established within the military regarding COVID19 over the past six months, during which time  the virus has downgraded in virulence.

In accordance with medical ethics, the chain of command is required to give service members choice in medical treatment with well-established efficacy and demonstrated safety. In 2005, the Journal of Virology reported that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent” treatment for SARs coronavirus, in “Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread.”

Zinc was also established in 2010 to inhibit coronavirus and block replication of virus cells. Trace element zinc is revered as “Nature’s Gift to Fight Unprecedented Global Pandemic COVID-19” in 2020 research and is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality for COVID-19.

In conclusion, the fast tracking of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for a probable mandate in the military will result in an unparalleled dilemma for commanders, with prodigious legal, medical, safety and ethical considerations that will clash with the DOD decision makers who have historically favored pharmaceutical vaccine contracts over medical choices of individuals.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Pam Long is graduate of USMA at West Point and is an Army Veteran of the Medical Service Corps. She served as a medical intelligence officer for NATO Stabilization Forces.

Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense.

Here are the Contact Details again for the FDA to urge them to address the issues in Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION.

Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research – email: – Phone: 240-402-8116

Dr. Stephen Hahn, Director of the FDA – email: – Phone (Main FDA #): 1-888-463-6332 – Twitter account: @SteveFDA

Tell them America does not want an experimental COVID vaccine until there are accurate tests available to identify SARS-CoV-2! Until then, they need to grant Dr. Lee his “Stay of Action“!