January 13, 2021 ~ By Levana Lomma with contributions from Makia Freeman
Q: If the recovery rate of all those who test positive for Covid is 99.95%, why is there even a need for a vaccine in the first place?
Vaccines usually take 7-20 years to adequately research, test and bring to market. The slew of COVID vaccines produced by Big Pharma companies like Pfizer and Moderna are being rushed to market in less than 12 months, which is nowhere enough time to meet established safety standards. No long-term safety studies were conducted, so no one has any real idea of the danger these vaccines could cause down the line. Many of the trials only lasted 3-4 months. Animal trials, an important part of safety testing, were skipped entirely.
Q: Why would a perfectly healthy person with a robust immune system want to make themselves sick with a toxic vaccine?
The COVID vaccines promote disease enhancement due to pathogenic priming. In other words, they make people sicker than the disease would have. In Moderna’s trials alone, 21% of people had significant adverse effects. Since the rollout of the COVID vax, doctors and nurses have experienced extreme fluctuations in blood pressure leading to fainting, been blinded, contracted Bell’s palsy and become paralyzed. Many people have even died following the vaccine, including in places like Miami, Portugal and Iceland.
Q: Why would anyone trust a vaccine technology that has never been used on humans before?
The COVID vaccines produced by Pfizer and Modern are called mRNA vaccines – a completely new type of vaccine that has never been licensed or used on humans before. We have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine and no way to know if it will be effective or safe. Traditional vaccines introduce pieces of a weakened virus to stimulate an immune response. mRNA vaccines inject molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-human sources into your cells, thus hijacking your genes and permanently reprogramming them to produce antibodies to kill the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus causing COVID. These newly created proteins are not regulated by your DNA and are thus completely foreign to your body.
Q: If the Covid-19 vaccine is not proven to be safe nor effective while also carrying a high risk of injury why would I want to have it?
With the risks of the COVID vaccine so undeniably grave, you might think the benefits are large. Think again. Big Pharma has stated that the vaccine only protects against mild (not moderate or severe) symptoms, which makes the vaccine virtually pointless, given the large majority of people who allegedly have COVID have little or no symptoms whatsoever.
Q: If the Covid Vaccine doesn’t stop transmission why are we told we can’t go back to normal until everyone is vaccinated?
Surprisingly, Big Pharma has also admitted they didn’t design the vaccine to stop transmission.
If that’s the case what did they design it for???
If someone else gets the vaccine, it doesn’t stop them from transmitting the virus to you, and if you get the vaccine, it does not stop you from transmitting the virus to others. Therefore, the vaccine plays absolutely no role in herd immunity.
The World Health Organization admitted that there is no “evidence on any of the [COVID] vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.”
Q: If SARS-CoV-2 has never been properly isolated in a lab, how can one make a vaccine for it?
The vaccine cannot possibly be truly effective since it was not based on an actual isolated sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The WHO protocols that Pfizer used to produce the mRNA do not appear to identify any nucleotide sequences that are unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When questioned about this, Pfizer confirmed: “The DNA template does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person.”
Q: How can this be called a vaccine if it doesn’t stop transmission or create immunity?
According to Dr. David Martin who spoke during the Focus on Fauci live webinar produced by New Earth Media:
“Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine. This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine.
Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards. And the vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission. And that is not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say “what other treatments are there?”
The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition and also it is actually the sucker punch to open and free discourse… Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARSCOV2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t yet have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small package of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site. And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue.
The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug because it meets the CDRH definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology – it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package.
So we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine then we are going to get into a vaccine conversation but this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine. As a result it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition just like we will not fall for their industrial chemical definition of health.
Both of them are functionally flawed and are an implicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited. I get frustrated when I hear activists and lawyers say “we are going to fight the vaccine”. If you stipulate it’s a vaccine you’ve already lost the battle. It’s not a vaccine. It is made to make you sick… 80% of the people exposed to SARSCOV2 are asymptomatic carriers. 80% of people who get this injected into them experience a clinical adverse event. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness, not to induce an immuno-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick.
When the paymaster for the distribution of information happens to be the industry that’s doing the distributing, we lose. Because the only narrative is the one that will be compensated by the people writing the check. That goes for our politicians… and our media – it has been paid for – if you follow the money you realize there is no non-conflicted voice on any network.”
Q: Just what are these psychopaths really trying to do to humanity?
Moderna, who has also been a leader in the development of a Covid-19 vaccine and has ties to the MIT project that involves implanting nanotechnology under the skin to provide a scannable immunity record has actually published on their website that this is true: the mRNA vaccine injects an “operating system” into your body that they call “The Software of Life.”
Q: If the vaccine manufacturers are not liable for the injuries and possible death, how can governments demand we take it?
Under the PREP Act of 2005, the COVID-19 vaccine will have near blanket immunity. That means if anyone is injured or killed, no one besides you and your family will bear responsibility — not the vaccine manufacturer, not the doctor administering the vaccine, nor the government body or employer who decided to mandate the vaccine. That is exceptionally alarming given the fact there are major safety concerns with the COVID-19 vaccine. Very simply, vaccine manufacturers cannot ensure the long-term safety of any COVID vaccine since the products have had months of clinical experience at best.
Are you willing to be a guinea pig for Big Pharma over a virus that most people easily recover from?Tweet