The Engineering of ‘Pandemics’

Vaccine-Induced Disease Epidemic Outbreaks

By A. True Ott, PhD, ND

 August 23, 2009

Video and Commentary by Levana Lomma ~ January 3, 2021

The year was 1921. America was entering a decade of robust prosperity. Later called “The Roaring Twenties”, it was a time of unparalleled economic expansion. Debt money from Wall Street banks was plentiful and easy to obtain. The “Great War” was over.

America was flexing her industrial muscles. Factories were being built and expanded in every major city. Automobiles began rolling off Detroit assembly lines in record numbers. The stock market began making millionaires. People were HEALTHY and HAPPY ­ largely because the dreaded “world mystery disease” (which decades later became known as the “1918 Flu Pandemic”) had disappeared. Two entire years had passed with no dreaded “mystery deaths” being reported. America had cause to celebrate, and celebrate they did!

As a matter of fact, the American Public in general was so optimistic and HAPPY in 1921, that relatively few people were unhealthy as well. For the first time in decades, hospital beds were empty. The fledgling American Medical Association, formed by John D. Rockefeller just a few years earlier, was worried. Business was sagging.

Profits from vaccines and drugs were spiraling. Something had to be done, and done immediately. False, faux epidemics of smallpox were created to solve the problem, and keep the Medical Mafia’s cash registers ringing.

We know this dastardly plan actually happened, thanks to a citizen’s WATCHDOG GROUP in Kansas City, Missouri named “The Advertiser’s Protective Bureau”, who filed, and successfully prosecuted criminal charges against the Missouri state chapter of the AMA ­ the Jackson Medical Society. The ‘Protective Bureau’s” official report of this cold-blooded plot reads as follows:

“In the Fall of 1921, the health of the city was unusually good, but slow for the doctors. So the Jackson Medical Society met and resolved to make an epidemic in the city. According to the minutes of this meeting: ‘MOTION WAS MADE AND SECONDED, THAT A RECOMMENDATION BE MADE BY THE COMMITTEE, TO THE BOARD OF HEALTH, THAT AN EPIDEMIC OF SMALLPOX BE DECLARED IN THE CITY.

(Investigation later revealed that there was NO SIGN OF AN EPIDEMIC at the time, in the city, or anywhere in the state or region!)

‘It was moved and seconded that a day be set aside, termed VACCINATION DAY, on which physicians would be stationed at ALL SCHOOLS, clinics, public buildings and hospitals to vaccinate “free of charge”.’

(Vaccinations are never “free”. The taxpayers are always forced to pay for every one of the “free” vaccines.)

“IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THAT WIDE PUBLICITY BE GIVEN, STATING THAT VACCINATION IS A PREVENTIVE OF SMALLPOX, AND URGING THE ABSOLUTE NECESSITY OF VACCINATION FOR EVERY MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD IN THE CITY.”

The Protective Bureau proved in court that there WAS NO EPIDEMIC before the vaccinations!! The court records show that the Medical Society manufactured vast amounts of posters, fliers, newspaper stories and ads featuring horrific and lurid pictures of diseased children covered with massive smallpox sores and open wounds. Some pictures actually showed children’s corpses covered with the same ugly sores. The PANIC-DRIVEN message was clear — VACCINATE EVERYONE, or face a deadly public disease. There was a “sweeping epidemic” in the city; the disease was “highly contagious” and would “strike anyone who was not vaccinated” was the bill of goods sold! (Does this sound at all familiar today ­ 88 years later??)

The Medical Mafia’s propaganda blitz was successful, and over a million previously healthy and happy American citizens were hypnotized and terrorized into placing the vaccine toxins into their bloodstreams. All public school children in the region were vaccinated while at school! Parents who dared question the vaccination of their children were ostracized and publicly vilified.

Audio version with my commentary

THE COURT RECORD ON THIS CASE IS VERY CLEAR.

In the weeks and months following the “mass vaccinations” the area’s hospital beds were filled to over-flowing with VACCINE-INDUCED SMALLPOX CASES!

Tens of thousands of people became ill, and many hundreds of innocents died, and many more were permanently crippled! Of course, THE NEWSPAPERS THEN TRUMPETED HOW WISE THE MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT WAS TO PROMOTE THE VACCINES ­ stating how much worse the death toll would have been without the vaccination campaign!! Untold MILLIONS OF DOLLARS of profit was generated by this massive “medical” fraud.

Thanks to the ADVERTISER’S PROTECTIVE BUREAU, however; the massive fraud was exposed and criminally prosecuted to a successful conviction. During the trial, three amazing facts were proven beyond any “reasonable doubt”.

Fact 1: The poster and advertising pictures showing the diseased and dying children used so successfully by the “doctors”, WERE NOT EVEN CASES OF LOCAL SMALLPOX CASES AS THEY WERE BILLED TO BE! The Protective Bureau documented that they were pictures of ENGLISH CHILDREN who were victims of “court-proven” cases of SMALLPOX VACCINE POISONING!!

One of the pictures was of a 5-week-old baby named Mona Stevenson, of Humphrey Street, Burnley, England. A previously healthy and happy baby, Little Mona had been vaccinated for smallpox at 5 weeks of age. Four weeks later, her pox-ridden little body was placed in a tiny coffin and buried. The horrific photos of Little Mona and others in England had previously been published in British newspapers where details of the resulting CRIMINAL TRIALS were also given. The full details of the trials, as well as the pictures, were also included in a comprehensively large medical boot titled “THE HISTORY AND PATHOLOGY OF VACCINATION” by Edgar M Crookshank, MD ­ professor of Bacteriology at the ultra-elite Kings College, London England.

Fact 2: Vaccines containing LIVE VIRUSES, weakened (i.e. attenuated) or otherwise universally causes more diseases than the vaccine ever could prevent.

Fact 3: Vaccine-Induced-Disease (VID) is an extremely effective socio-economic tool. It has the potential to generate BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF WINDFALL PROFITS, while permanently changing the social structures of large groups of people.

While the Protective Bureau won the criminal court case ­ the American People lost. The case should have made front-page headlines around the nation, showing the Modus Operandi of certain corrupt “medical practitioners”. How, by means of fraud, treachery, and trickery, they made millions of dollars in windfall profits while thousands of innocent, trusting, and naïve Americans suffered and died. The entire sordid affair, with all its damning details, was kept out of the American Press. John D. Rockefeller’s AMA, with its millions of dollars of influence ­ made sure of that!

Amazingly, even though thousands of people had died or become crippled by this managed manslaughter, the doctors involved were only given a light penalty in the form of a token fine. The medical establishment as a whole was not upset in the least by the exposure ­ and has continued on unabated perpetuating the same crimes against humanity ­ creating vaccine-induced-diseases while fleecing the people continually until this present day.

It is a proven (albeit little-known) fact, EPIDEMIC/PANDEMIC MANUFACTURING IS STANDARD PRACTICE with the world-wide “Medical Mafia” circles. In order to maximize profits and re-shape geographical regions, they often manufacture a false-flag “emergency”. If there is an outbreak of mild seasonal virus, they call it an influenza pandemic, give it a fancy new name, and then actually CREATE THE PANDEMIC by means of mass vaccinations using ATTENUATED, or LIVE VIRUSES!!

Remember the shocking words of the AMA’s Dr. Simon Louis Katzoff who said: ” DOCTORS LIVE BY DISEASE, SO THE PUBLIC CAN EXPECT THE SUPPLY OF DISEASE TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION.”

OTHER DOCUMENTED CASES OF V.I.D.E.O.s (Vaccine Induced Disease Epidemic Outbreaks.)

Case 1: Following the lead of their colleagues in Kansas City, the exact same events occurred in Pittsburgh, PA under the direction of Pittsburgh’s “Health Director”, Dr. C.J. Voux in the autumn of 1924. As in Kansas City, a group of public watchdogs brought suit against Voux and his vaccine-promoters. As in Kansas City, the vaccine promoters were found guilty. The case documented that over 1,000,000 vaccine shots were “sold” to the residents of Pennsylvania, even though there had been ZERO documented cases of smallpox in the region. It was successfully proven that ONLY AFTER the million shots had been given, that a smallpox epidemic began.

This vaccine-induced, manmade “epidemic” resulted in 330 deaths and at least 1,680 cases of severe smallpox that caused permanent, crippling damage to the survivors. Moreover, it cost the city a total monetary loss of $3,069,616; although Dr. Voux and his accomplices had collected more than $10 million in hospital and related care revenues ­ they were not forced to pay for damages or reparations. As in the Kansas City trial, a small, insignificant fine was levied, and the case was not widely publicized.

Case 2: The initial batches of Dr. Jonas Salk’s polio vaccine produced thousands of cases of poliomyelitis in vaccinated individuals. (One such case was Franklin D. Roosevelt ­ who was stricken weeks after receiving a vaccine.) This was due to an unsafe amount of LIVE VIRUSES in the vaccine itself. Dr. Sabin then introduced his “improved” vaccine with “attenuated” or “weakened’ live viruses in 1958, and the following year his vaccine was made to be compulsory (mandatory) in all school-age children in a number of states.

As a result, polio increased a whopping 300% in these states. For example, Tennessee reported 119 polio cases in 1958, after “vaccination” this total increased to 386 cases in 1959, Ohio ­ 17 cases in 1958, 52 cases in 1959, Connecticut ­ 45 cases in 1958, 123 cases in 1959, and North Carolina: 78 cases in 1958 compared to 312 cases in 1959 AFTER forcing compulsory shots in school children. The modern record is equally damning. The ONLY cases of recorded polio in the modern era is immediately following vaccinations.

Poliomyelitis, you see, is a water-borne virus and is caused by drinking contaminated water.

During the early 60’s, water-treatment facilities became standardized across America ­ small amounts of CHLORINATION effectively wiped out polio viruses. The conquering of polio had NOTHING TO DO with the vaccine needles and swallowing sugar cubes.

In fact, as author Ed Haslem documents so well in his book, Dr. Mary’s Monkey, the Sabin vaccines were actually contaminated with mutated GREEN MONKEY VIRUSES (SV-40 viruses to be specific) which has caused untold millions of SOFT-TISSUE CANCERS and deaths worldwide. (The cancer “industry” has reaped BILLIONS of dollars from this “contamination” over the years, of course.) Dr. Maurice Hilleman has actually confessed as being a part of this very activity.

Case 3: Knowingly added to “hepatitis” vaccines, HIV viruses were inoculated into thousands of homosexual men and intravenous drug users in America’s inner cities resulting in the “AIDS epidemic” in the 80’s. Purposefully placed in SMALLPOX VACCINE SYRINGES, HIV was also introduced into African nations as a tool of ethnic cleansing and GENOCIDE. The covert development and weaponization of the HIV/AIDS virus and its monkey-virus origins, along with the amazing story of how the scientists involved are tied to President Kennedy’s assassination is well documented in Dr. Mary’s Monkey. The covert biological experimentation labs responsible for this mayhem are today consolidated into the NIH, the NAIDS, the National Cancer Institute, and Ft. Detrick, Maryland. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta became the centralized hub of pandemic and epidemic creations and propagation.

Case 4: The 1976 “Swine Flu” Fiasco and Fraud is perpetrated. A solitary soldier at Ft. Dix collapses and dies following a reaction to an “experimental” vaccine while completing an intense physical “forced march” exercise at Ft. Dix. Immediately, the CDC swings into action, declaring a nationwide SWINE FLU PANDEMIC is pending. Providentially, of course, the CDC just happens to have 200+MILLION DOSES of Swine Flu vaccine already stockpiled, prepared with ATTENUATED (live, yet weakened) viruses and experimental ADJUVANTS.

President Gerald Ford, (with proven ties to Big Pharma and Nixon’s covert viral weapons labs ­ also a key member of the “Warren Commission’s” obfuscation of the JFK murder) rolls up his sleeves on national TV and dutifully takes the vaccine. 40 million vaccines are given to naïve American human guinea pigs. A rash of auto-immune disorders (Guillan-Barre Syndrome GBS, and lupus) as well as a large number of deaths is immediately attributed to the vaccine, and the mass vaccination campaign is halted. (What happened to the other 140 million vaccines, one may ask?) In 1979, the television news magazine 60 Minutes did a documentary investigation on this travesty-for-money scandal. Against all odds and the threats of Big Pharma, the OBJECTIVELY FAIR 60 Minutes program aired ONE TIME. There was no follow-up story, No criminal indictments were ever issued. There was no MASS- MURDER-FOR-HIRE trial. As a result, America has largely forgotten the 1976 SWINE FLU SCANDAL!

Case 5: During the first Gulf War ­ Operation Desert Storm, an experimental anthrax vaccine was forcibly given to 140,000 rear-echelon support troops. This experimental vaccine included an oil-in-water adjuvant called squalene (aka MF-59 made by NOVARTIS). Despite voluminous studies showing dangerous toxicity factors conducted on “oil-in-water” adjuvants at such prestigious research labs as UCLA ­ the U.S. Military brass consented to the experimental injections. As a result, ALL 140,000 troops developed a condition subsequently named “Gulf War Syndrome”. This sordid tale is explained in a very honest and credible book by Gary Matsumoto, called, Vaccine-A.

There is no such thing as a natural pandemic. Every single viral "pandemic" in modern history has been the result of a mass vaccination campaign.

— Somebody Had To Say It (@LevanaLomma1) January 4, 2021

ALL MODERN “PANDEMICS” ARE CAUSED BY VACCINE NEEDLES

As this author has repeatedly declared during many public radio interviews, the deadly 1918 Influenza Pandemic was the direct result of live-virus-contaminated Typhus Fever Vaccines mandatorily given to U.S. and Allied military personnel during World War I. During that era, viruses were not yet discovered and diseases were thought to be bacterial only. These deadly typhus fever vaccines were manufactured by John D. Rockefeller’s research labs and Chinese pharma factories. The vaccine “seed stock” consisted of viruses harvested from human typhoid fever patients, cross-injected into swine herds to create increased “seed stock”, and then injected into chicken and turkey eggs for further incubation of the pathogens. The final, harvested “vaccine material” then was injected into HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF HUMAN VEINS. The result was a massive ‘pandemic’ that claimed the lives of as many as 50 million people worldwide.

In 1918, the viral pandemic was an honest mistake ­ the result of a combination of a very bad vaccine and gross ignorance about viruses and the diseases they cause. However, the continued denial of these FACTS, and the subsequent REVERSE ENGINEERING OF THE KILLER VIRUS in Ft. Detrick labs (1997-2003) is inexcusable and constitutes a veritable crime against humanity.

Moreover, the ONLY WAY a modern “SWINE FLU PANDEMIC” can actually materialize is by injection of certain LIVE VIRUSES via vaccine needles. Make no mistake, the world is NOT experiencing a true pandemic explosion at this time ­ but it most assuredly WILL when and if the planned mass influenza vaccinations are completed worldwide.

THE DANGERS INHERENT IN “DUPLEX” VACCINES FROM DESIGNER VIRUSES

“Modern Medical Practitioners”, including some well-meaning “osteopaths”, would have the world believe the MYTH that vaccines containing attenuated (weakened) live viruses cannot cause the viral disease conditions they are targeting. This is a most dangerous misconception for the following SCIENTIFIC reasons.

Traditional “common” vaccines targeting measles, mumps and rubella for instance, contain small amounts of “attenuated” live viruses which have been “weakened” but not 100% killed outright. Research has shown that these weakened “live” viruses create a very mild form of the disease in the human that has been vaccinated, which in turn creates a cellular immunity from that pathogen. The science behind this is correct, and valid for the most part. To keep the targeted viral pathogen in a perpetually weakened state, specific amounts of formaldehyde and ether are typically added, and in some formulations, mercury in the form of thimerasol is added as a preservative to keep the egg albumin cells from decaying and dying prematurely. The established theory behind all of this ‘vaccination’ is the “protect the herd” theory which originated with Pasteur in the late 19th century. As in all vaccines, a certain small percentage of the herd will develop severe, ‘full blown’ disease states CAUSED by the attenuated viruses in the vaccine itself, and another percentage will exhibit side effects from the chemicals added to the vaccine ­ but if the vast majority of the herd is “protected” from the disease condition ­ the vaccine is approved and stamped “safe and effective”.

Science has also proven that each viral pathogen has its own unique characteristics that produce its own set of symptoms in the human hosts. Thus, each viral pathogen has its own unique fingerprints of replication and reproduction as well. Each virus also has a different level of effectiveness in its attenuated (weakened) state.

Moreover, some viruses have shown the ability to “drift” and acquire additional genetic alterations over time. THIS IS ESPECIALLY TRUE OF THE SO-CALLED “NOVEL” RECOMBINATION VIRUSES that have been “reverse engineered” in the world’s weapons laboratories!

When the RNA of the virus is spliced with other viral genes, the resulting “Franken-virus” is very unpredictable. Studies conducted (yet currently unpublished) by Terrence Tumpey, Jeffrey Taubenberger, and others at the NIH and CDC show that these ‘resurrected pandemic viruses’ do not exhibit the NORMAL tendencies of traditional, NATURAL influenza viruses such as seasonal H3N2 human strains. They are best described as “Viral Wild Cards”.

This is just one problem with the headlong, mad rush to vaccinate Americans with a series of reverse-engineered lab-created viruses, attenuated or otherwise, in an UNTESTED, UNTRIED, EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE that has not been subjected to LONG-TERM CLINICAL TRIALS TO DETERMINE THE LEVELS OF “DRIFT” or even ATTENUATED TENDENCIES OVER TIME.

To supposedly minimize this “safety” issue, the CDC is now recommending a DUPLEX vaccination, of all things. A “duplex” vaccination basically involves a two-shot series. The first shot consists of a VERY WEAK, HIGHLY ATTENUTATED dose of the live virus.

This is intended to create an initial immune response patterning the specific virus injected. Within a couple of weeks of the 1st shot, a BOOSTER SHOT is given. The booster shot has only lightly attenuated, or even FULL STRENGTH VIRUSES in the injection. This 2nd shot is then intended to create a full-strength immune system response in the human subject.

This is, at the very least, BAD SCIENCE and borders on insanity for self-evident and fairly obvious reasons. By their own admissions, the NIH scientists in their various writings have declared that the level of potency of these REVERSE ENGINEERED VIRUSES show abnormal, almost RANDOM tendencies in their attenuated states. Nobody really knows what will happen over time as the inevitable “genetic drifts” occur. It is a literal crap shoot. It is highly probable that even the HIGHLY ATTENUATED FRANKEN-VIRUSES can swiftly regain their FULL POTENCY even in the presence of ether and formaldehyde. (See Addendum Below) Secondly, the full-strength BOOSTER shot viruses could just as easily “DRIFT” into something much more deadly than the “original’ recombinant virus that it is targeting.

I submit that the scientists responsible for this “pandemic” are not stupid. They have to know these facts as well as I do.

Therefore, I can only conclude that this entire affair is following the Modus Operandi of the medical elite since the 1920 engineered smallpox epidemics. It is all being ORCHESTRATED first and foremost for MONEY, and secondly, for social and geographical restructuring of the “human herd”.

Also, it must be understood that this “Novel 2009 Influenza” is not easily nor readily transmissible between humans. (See published study in the addendum). If this report is accurate, how then did the “Pandemic” begin, and why the need for mass vaccinations at all?? Like the “study” shows, the only way the test ferrets could contract or transmit the 2009 “Novel Swine Flu” was by and through INOCULATION OF THE DISEASE!! Humanity demands an answer, and demands it NOW!!!

A. True Ott, Phd, ND

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

George Santayana

Those who are ignorant of the past, cannot be expected to remember it. ~A. True Ott, Phd, ND

ADDENDUM ABSTRACTS FROM SELECTED FRANKEN-VIRUS STUDIES

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11226311? ordinalpos=70&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pub med_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

Feb. 27, 2001

Sequence of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus nonstructural gene (NS) segment and characterization of recombinant viruses bearing the 1918 NS genes.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez? Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Basler%20CF%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus<

Basler CF

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Reid%20AH%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Reid AH,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Dybing%20JK%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Dybing JK,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Janczewski%20TA%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Janczewski TA,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Fanning%20TG%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Fanning TG,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Zheng%20H%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Zheng H,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Salvatore%20M%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Salvatore M,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Perdue%20ML%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Perdue ML,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrezDb=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Swayne%20DE%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Swayne DE,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Garc%C3%ADaSastre%20A%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

García-Sastre A,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Palese%20P%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Palese P,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez? Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Taubenberger%20JK%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Tumpey TM.

Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Recent reports of mild to severe influenza-like illness in humans caused by a novel swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza virus underscore the need to better understand the pathogenesis and transmission of these viruses in mammals. In this study, selected 2009 A(H1N1) influenza isolates were assessed for their ability to cause disease in mice and ferrets and compared with a contemporary seasonal H1N1 virus for their ability to transmit to naïve ferrets through respiratory droplets. In contrast to seasonal influenza H1N1 virus, 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses caused increased morbidity, replicated to higher titers in lung tissue, and were recovered from the intestinal tract of intranasally inoculated ferrets. The 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses exhibited less efficient respiratory droplet transmission in ferrets in comparison with the highly transmissible phenotype of a seasonal H1N1 virus. Transmission of the 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses was further corroborated by characterizing the binding specificity of the viral hemagglutinin to the sialylated glycan receptors (in the human host) by use of dose-dependent direct receptor-binding and human lung tissue-binding assays.

Original article found on Rense.com

Advertisement

Meta Analysis of 54 Studies Shows Asymptomatic Spread is FALSE

December 29, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

The mass majority of the population appears to be in a hypnotic state. They have been told they must “stay home to save lives” and are much better off sitting in front of their television than to be out spreading disease. Doesn’t matter of course that they are healthy: enter the “asymptomatic carrier”.

Entire economies have been completely obliterated thanks to this unfounded, nonsensical, unscientific and unproven THEORY. Family members no longer hug each other and small talk in grocery lines has become a thing of the past. Even just a friendly smile is no longer safe, or even worth the effort since no one can see each other’s faces anyway.

And this is the New Normal.

A place where being human is far too dangerous thanks to the fear propaganda fueling the concept of asymptomatic spread.

Yet all of this fear that perfectly healthy people can be spreading disease has never once been proven true and our very own experts including Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, and Dr. Fauci himself have both said that asymptomatic spread is rare, and not the driver of an outbreak.

Now a new study published on December 14, 2020 in the Journals of The American Medical Association confirms what many of us have known from the very beginning: the idea of asymptomatic spread is FALSE. The use of this concept has largely been implemented as a method of control and an instrument for global economic destruction while keeping the masses easily manipulated through fear.

In this recent publication, meta analysis of 54 studies with 77,758 participants showed that the rate of asymptomatic and presymptomatic index cases was 0.7% (95% CI 0%-4.9%).

The asymptomatic/presymptomatic secondary attack rate is not statistically different from zero, and the confidence interval is technically 0.7 ± 4.2, resulting in a range of -3.5%-4.9%, but attack rates cannot be negative, so it is truncated at 0.

ZERO.

Just like the other studies we have seen which also found exactly ZERO incidence of secondary infection from asymptomatic individuals.

Back in May there was a study out of China that looked at 455 contacts who had been exposed to a patient in a hospital who tested positive but showed no symptoms. Not one of the 455 contacts tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.

ZERO.

In November of 2020 another study done in Wuhan, China was published involving nearly 10 million participants. In this study NOT ONE positive test result came from the 1,174 contacts who were exposed to asymptomatic carriers.

ZERO.

https://rumble.com/vcawvz-asymptomatic-spread-is-proven-to-be-false.html

Please subscribe to my Bit Chute Channel as well! I don’t see myself being on You Tube much longer!

“We would really like to see the data, because if there is asymptomatic transmission, it really impacts the policies regarding screening, etc. But the one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci

Right from the horses mouth.

And yet the masking and the lockdowns and the quarantines continue. How much longer are we going to keep playing this game? When will the truth bear any weight on the decisions around policies? When will the politicians start representing the people instead of the stakeholders and lobbyists?

When will the hypnotized masses awaken to the grand deception and demand an end to this insanity? Only if they turn off their television…then we may stand a chance.

Finally: WHO Admits There is a Problem With The PCR Test

December 19, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Scientists have known for some time that there are serious flaws when it comes to using the RT-PCR test to detect a virus. Questions around it’s accuracy since as far back as the AIDS epidemic prove that those in the know have been in the know since before this Plandemic began.

In 2007 a New York Times article titled, “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t” detailed how a Whooping Cough “epidemic” turned out to be a “false alarm” due to faith in the “highly sensitive molecular test” being used to look for pertussis among healthcare workers that were falling ill. Further lab results revealed otherwise and Gina Kolata wrote, “it appears the health care workers probably were afflicted with ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.”

This is the same situation found today with the PCR test, which has been touted as the “Gold Standard” in which to detect SARS-CoV2, but simply cannot be considered reliable in determining the presence of any live virus because the process of amplification can result in any number of viral particles, dead or alive, producing a positive result not indicative of infection.

On December 14, 2020 the World Health Organization finally issued a notice revealing a “problem” with the RT-PCR test to be considered by health care workers. The notice reports:

WHO has received user feedback on an elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results when testing specimens using RT-PCR reagents on open systems.  

Leading to a call for healthcare workers to determine whether an adjustment in Cycle Threshold may be necessary:

to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.

This is exactly what has been said over and again by many experts, including Dr. Anthony Fauci himself: A Ct value above 35 cycles can result in a positive test from an amplification of particles that have absolutely nothing to do with SARS-CoV2.

The notice goes on to say…

[W]hen specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain. Thus, the IFU will state how to interpret specimens at or near the limit for PCR positivity. In some cases, the IFU will state that the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise.

This goes right along with what the inventor of the test himself had said as well: that the PCR test was not designed for and should not be used for diagnosis. Yet here we are, basing every economic policy and all regulations around returning to a “normal” life on the number of “confirmed” cases.

It is nothing less than criminal to have known all along the serious flaws in the PCR test and continue to use it to make life and death decisions that will have a lasting effect on us all.

The real question is: what will we do with this admission by the World Health Organization? Will there be a significant change in the course of this insanity train? Or will we just ignore this FACT just like the 1.4% Infection Fatality Rate and the WHO guidance that mask wearing should be reserved for those who are sick?

WHO is really calling the shots?

Thanks for subscribing!

Fool Me Once…

No “Normalcy” on The Horizon Even With a Vaccine

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks during a news conference in the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2020.
Chris Kleponis | Bloomberg | Getty Images

December 17, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Covid-19 continues to dominate the headlines and there seems to be no end in sight to the continued media frenzy over “confirmed cases”. What the media fails to report on as usual is the declining death rate and the the fact that total deaths for the year are not far off from the average.

But that’s to be expected, of course, if you are trying to maintain the heightened sense of threat needed to induce a fear driven consent to continued tyranny for the sake of “safety”.

By the summer of 2020 talking heads in governments worldwide were parroting the adage that things cannot go “back normal until we have a vaccine.”

Yet, here we are six months later, and as the Pfizer vaccine is making it’s way into healthcare settings for distribution in the U.S and elsewhere, we have people like Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health associate Amy Hobbs declaring that “wearing a mask will become part of my daily life, moving forward, even after a vaccine is deployed.”

Flip flopping on the story has been the common theme among the experts and now once again we have our favorite expert Dr. Anthony Fauci, Head of The National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, going from warning us of the dangers in continued economic and social lockdown back in spring to letting us know (without any real explanation) that any chance of a return to normal is not expected until fall of 2021 at the earliest.

Another one of our favorite Fauci quotes was recorded during a 60 Minutes interview with Dr. Jon LaPook where he avowed that “people should not be walking around in masks”, and while many have assumed that the mask wearing would end once a vaccine hit the scenes, we now have our favorite double speaking health expert declaring:

“Obviously, with a 90-plus percent effective vaccine, you could feel much more confident” about not getting the virus, Fauci told Tapper. “But I would recommend to people to not abandon all public health measures just because you have been vaccinated.” Those fundamentals include: universal wearing of masks, maintaining physical distance, avoiding large crowds, doing more outdoor activities and washing hands frequently.

Because “even though, for the general population, it might be 90[%] to 95% effective,” said Fauci, “you don’t necessarily know, for you, how effective it is.” Even at those success rates, about 5% to 10% of people immunized may still get the virus.

CNBC.com

Sadly, the majority of the unsuspecting public remains completely oblivious of the constant use of promises of TEMPORARY restrictions to elicit consent to a long term agenda. By the time they realize they’ve been fooled it’s already too late.

The methodical deconstruction of the current system is already well under way and most have found a certain comfort in their compliance as they quickly forget that it was supposed to be two weeks to flatten the curve.

It only takes about two months for a certain behavior to become habit, and the ruling class know this. They have spent many decades perfecting the manipulation of human psychology in order to get us to this place.

So, now here we are nearly a year after this all began and while many were fine with forfeiting their constitutional rights temporarily in order to allow governments to “save lives” they have easily become transformed into obedient, unthinking lemmings that keep falling for the next carrot on a stick.

The next carrot on a stick to move this agenda where they want it to go will be a financial incentive to get vaccinated, and they will be sure the people are good and broke before they offer it up.

Former congressman John Delaney has proposed a very clever way to reach this goal to vaccinate 70% of the population: a $1,500 stimulus check for those agreeing to take the untested, rushed into production, liability exempt Covid-19 vaccine.

Of course vaccine stakeholders and fascist dictators alike boast this is a most benevolent strategy designed to save the economy and lives in one clean sweep. Of course those who see beyond the promises and lies know the intent is the exact opposite, perfectly packaged for the believers.

Fool me twice…

Head of Pfizer Research: Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization

Health Impact News:

“Stay of Action” Filed Against FDA to STOP Approval of COVID Vaccine for Using Faulty PCR Tests in Trials

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

An ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION has been filed with the Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the new Pfizer COVID vaccine that has been submitted for “emergency use authorization” (EUA).

It is widely expected that the FDA is going to grant EUA fast-track approval to Pfizer’s experimental COVID vaccine within days.

The STAY OF ACTION is a Petition for Administrative Action Regarding Confirmation of Efficacy End Points of Phase III Clinical Trials of COVID19 Vaccines.

The STAY OF ACTION is based upon the faulty PCR tests that were used in the vaccine trials:

Before an EUA or unrestricted license is issued for the Pfizer vaccine, or for other vaccines for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection, all “endpoints” or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by Sanger sequencing, given the high cycle thresholds used in some trials. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee

The Petitioner of this ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION is Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist and founder of Milford Molecular Diagnostics, a CLIA-certified diagnostic laboratory in Milford, Connecticut.

Dr. Lee is a world-renowned expert on DNA sequencing-based diagnostics. He has trained and taught in some of the world’s most prestigious institutions and has published scores of scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals.

He recognized very early on that the PCR tests and other tests fast-tracked by the FDA were not accurate in identifying SARSCoV-2 RNA, and even sent a letter, back in March, to Dr. Margaret Harris and Dr. Eduardo Guerrero of the World Health Organization, and Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), explaining why the tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA were generating false positives and negatives.

You can read his March 22, 2020 letter here. He explained that a two-phased test would “guarantee no-false positive results” based on his research and published work from Japan.

According to Attorney Mary Holland of Children’s Health Defense, he never received a reply from the WHO or the NIH. To this day, they continue to use faulty tests to identify COVID.

So here we are now at the end of November, 2020, and the FDA appears to be ready to grant EUA fast-track approval to COVID vaccines that have gone through Phase I, II, and III vaccine trials, all using these faulty COVID tests.

In Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION, he recognizes the great risk for harm on the American public if the vaccine trials are approved based on these faulty tests.

Petitioner and the public will suffer irreparable harm if the actions requested herein are not granted, because once the FDA licenses this COVID-19 vaccine, both governments and employers may make this product mandatory (in general, or for airline or international travel) or may recommend it for widespread use.

If the assignment of cases and non-cases during the course of the trial is not accurate, the vaccine will not have been properly tested. If the vaccine is not properly tested, important public policy decisions regarding its use will be based on misleading evidence. The medical and economic consequences to the nation could hardly be higher.

The New York State Bar Association has already issued a report on COVID-19 recommending that, “a vaccine subject to scientific evidence of safety and efficacy be made widely available, and widely encouraged, and if the public health authorities conclude necessary, required…”

Thus, it is reasonable to suspect that COVID-19 vaccines, including the Pfizer vaccine, could become mandatory. Without the FDA assuring proper efficacy trials of the vaccine now, the Petitioner and the public may not have the opportunity to object to receiving the vaccine, which was approved based on currently deficient and unreliable clinical trial data.

How likely is it that HHS and the FDA will grant this stay and deal with the PCR testing deficiencies before issuing emergency use fast-track approval to the Pfizer vaccine?

Not very likely at all, unless the public puts pressure on them to be more transparent and deal with these testing deficiencies, that top scientists all around the world now are speaking out against. See:

“Pandemic is Over” – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says “Second Wave” Faked On False-Positive COVID Tests

German Lawsuit Against “FactCheckers” Will Force Them To Prove Legitimacy of COVID Tests

Dr. Peter Marks is the head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, and will be the main person to make the decision of whether or not to issue an EUA for the Pfizer COVID vaccine. He recently told the press that “Americans can expect a very open process” in their evaluation of the experimental vaccine. (Source.)

We need thousands if not tens of thousands of Americans to contact Dr. Peter Marks and let him know the public is watching, and that we want the FDA to consider Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION and respond to it.

Here is Dr. Marks’ public contact info:

Dr. Peter Marks – email: Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov – Phone: 240-402-8116

Here is FDA Director Dr. Stephen Hahn’s contact info:

Dr. Stephen Hahn – email: Stephen.Hahn@fda.hhs.gov – Phone (Main FDA #): 1-888-463-6332 – Twitter account: @SteveFDA

A Strong Warning to the U.S. Military about Operation Warp Speed

War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg and the “Doctors Trial.” Adolf Hitler’s personal physician, 43-year old Karl Brandt. Brandt was also Reich Commissar for Health and Sanitation, and was indicted by the U.S. prosecution with 22 other Nazi doctors. Brandt was found guilty of participating in and consenting to using concentration camp inmates as guinea pigs in horrible medical experiments, supposedly for the benefit of the armed forces. He was sentenced to death by hanging along with 6 other doctors who received death sentences. Image Source.

If you are a member of the military who will soon be called upon to participate in Operation Warp Speed and help distribute the new experimental COVID vaccine, be careful that you do not end up on the wrong side of history!

Just claiming to be “following orders” if massive deaths and injuries result from this experimental vaccine may not save you!

That is what many of the Nazi doctors in Germany who served under Hitler tried to claim, but during the Nuremberg trials, and specifically the “Doctors Trial” in 1946-1947, twenty of the twenty-three defendants were medical doctors, and were accused of having been involved in Nazi human experimentation and mass murder.

Of the 23 defendants, seven were acquitted and seven received death sentences; the remainder received prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment.

What they did under German law, or maybe “emergency orders” during war time, was probably perfectly “legal” at the time, but after the Hitler regime was overthrown those who committed these “legal” actions that resulted in murder and crimes against humanity, were brought to justice after the war.

Dr. Peter Marks and Dr. Stephen Hahn would also do well to just not blindly excuse Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION, because Dr. Lee appears to have close ties to Attorney Mary Holland, currently the Counsel for Children’s Health Defense and former Professor of Law at NYU, and one of the nation’s top attorneys when it comes to vaccines.

Mary Holland works now for Attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who himself has become one the top attorneys in the world taking on Big Pharma.

He currently has 4 lawsuits filed against pharmaceutical giant Merck, for their approval of the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, which has destroyed the lives of so many young people due to being fast-tracked into the market.

The work of Dr. Sin Hang Lee and his DNA sequencing-based diagnostic testing on the HPV Gardasil vaccine found DNA fragments in the vaccine, something that Merck and the FDA had denied. See:

Fighting Academic Censorship on Gardasil Vaccine Research, Dr. Sin Hang Lee Challenges Medical and Scientific Community to Debate in Open Forum

His work in identifying these problems with the Gardasil vaccine led Japan to stop recommending the vaccine as part of their national vaccination program.

Here is a warning from a former Military Commander regarding current Commanders taking part of Operation Warp Speed, and the legal risks of doing so, published at Children’s Health Defense.

Former Officer Warns Military of Pitfalls Surrounding COVID Vaccine Mandate

Fast tracking the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for a probable military mandate creates unparalleled dilemma for commanders who will face prodigious legal, medical, safety and ethical questions.

By Pam Long
Children’s Health Defense

As the former commanding officer of the Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment of the 36th Medical Evacuation Battalion, I recommend urgent caution for military commanders with orders to have all soldiers vaccinated with the experimental SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

My concerns include the legality of a mandate, lack of treatment protocols and surveillance for adverse reactions, and a research-based risk assessment.

Legal challenges to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mandate

Under Emergency Use Authorization, state governments cannot mandate the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the civilian sector. A military mandate would require demonstration that the military sector had a compelling justification for a mandate. Healthy, young service members are not an at-risk group as they are not obese, not over the age of 65 and do not have comorbidities that cause complications from respiratory diseases.

The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine currently is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Even with a pending warp-speed FDA approval in the next month, the military, which still hasn’t rectified the failures, summarized here, of its Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP) isn’t in a position to implement a safe SARS-CoV-2 program. The Pfizer and Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, both of which use new mRNA technology, have much more potential for reactogenicity than the anthrax vaccine.

In short, federal courts have set precedent that mandating experimental vaccines in the military is illegal. As I wrote in a previous article:

“In 2008, the federal court affirmed that the FDA, [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] HHS and [Department of Defense] DOD allowed an illegal AVIP program by mandating an experimental anthrax vaccine for military personnel that was not licensed for use against inhalation anthrax, nor approved for use by a presidential waiver.”

The illegal anthrax vaccine mandate caused adverse health outcomes in thousands of service members, triggered a retention crisis among pilots and imposed disciplinary actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice against service members who refused an experimental and highly reactogenic vaccine.

All of these outcomes are likely to reoccur under a SARS-CoV-2 mandate. The HHS distribution plan will allow for millions of people to take the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within a short period of time before any signals of adverse reactions are identified.

A military mandate would also have to demonstrate compelling reason to remove the right of service members to vaccine exemption by confirming with blood titers testing that they have antibody immunity.

Virologists at the La Jolla Institute of Immunology reported to the New York Times in November 2020 regarding coronavirus:

“Eight months after infection, most people who have recovered still have enough immune cells to fend off the virus and prevent illness, the new data show. A slow rate of decline in the short term suggests, happily, that these cells may persist in the body for a very, very long time to come.”

The researchers reported that natural immunity can last years.

Policy on treatment protocols and surveillance for adverse reactions

Commanders should reject any plan to mass vaccinate service members with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine without an active surveillance policy in writing to review.

That policy should include a phased roll-out of the vaccine, a screening form for contraindications, vaccine exemptions (for medical contraindication, religious and personal belief accommodations, and those who are immune), education for service members on how to report adverse reactions to the Defense Medical Surveillance System, and training for medical providers on safe vaccine storage along with treatment protocols for adverse reactions.

The lack of established treatment protocols for immune backfiring known as Antibody Dependent Enhancement, when antibodies enhance uptake of the virus instead of neutralizing, should set off alarms for this entire mRNA vaccine program.

Review of the research-based risk assessment

Commanders should demand to see a research-based risk assessment from DOD on the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. This risk assessment should be compared to the alternative “no vaccine mandate” course of action for a virus with a 99.9% survival rate.

Some of the hazards previously identified in mRNA animal research include liver damage in ferrets, enhanced respiratory disease in mice and ADE lung damage in monkeys. Furthermore, service members of child-producing ages, both male and female, should be informed that developmental and reproductive toxicity has not been established in this vaccine.

Since the U.S. has sidestepped identifying mitigating controls in animal trials for COVID vaccines, then the research implores that all humans should be screened for potential vaccine-induced autoimmunity, and health providers to be prepared for both excessive swelling and pathological clotting.

Safety precautions, as outlined in the study “mRNA Vaccines — a New Era in Vaccinology,” include:

“However, recent human trials have demonstrated moderate and in rare cases severe injection site or systemic reactions for different mRNA platforms. Potential safety concerns that are likely to be evaluated in future preclinical and clinical studies include local and systemic inflammation, the biodistribution and persistence of expressed immunogen, stimulation of auto-reactive antibodies and potential toxic effects of any non-native nucleotides and delivery system components.

A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity.

Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken.

Another potential safety issue could derive from the presence of extracellular RNA during mRNA vaccination. Extracellular naked RNA has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may thus contribute to oedema. Another study showed that extracellular RNA promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation.

Safety will therefore need continued evaluation as different mRNA modalities and delivery systems are utilized for the first time in humans and are tested in larger patient populations.”

Medical ethics require patients’ informed consent in treatment 

Given that the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is designed to reduce symptoms and not to prevent infection or transmission, the military lacks a compelling justification for a vaccine mandate for members who are not at risk of virus complications.

This virus does not pose the fatality risks of anthrax or smallpox biological weapons in 2001. There has not been an “imminent risk” established within the military regarding COVID19 over the past six months, during which time  the virus has downgraded in virulence.

In accordance with medical ethics, the chain of command is required to give service members choice in medical treatment with well-established efficacy and demonstrated safety. In 2005, the Journal of Virology reported that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent” treatment for SARs coronavirus, in “Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread.”

Zinc was also established in 2010 to inhibit coronavirus and block replication of virus cells. Trace element zinc is revered as “Nature’s Gift to Fight Unprecedented Global Pandemic COVID-19” in 2020 research and is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality for COVID-19.

In conclusion, the fast tracking of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for a probable mandate in the military will result in an unparalleled dilemma for commanders, with prodigious legal, medical, safety and ethical considerations that will clash with the DOD decision makers who have historically favored pharmaceutical vaccine contracts over medical choices of individuals.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Pam Long is graduate of USMA at West Point and is an Army Veteran of the Medical Service Corps. She served as a medical intelligence officer for NATO Stabilization Forces.

Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense.

Here are the Contact Details again for the FDA to urge them to address the issues in Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION.

Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research – email: Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov – Phone: 240-402-8116

Dr. Stephen Hahn, Director of the FDA – email: Stephen.Hahn@fda.hhs.gov – Phone (Main FDA #): 1-888-463-6332 – Twitter account: @SteveFDA

Tell them America does not want an experimental COVID vaccine until there are accurate tests available to identify SARS-CoV-2! Until then, they need to grant Dr. Lee his “Stay of Action“!

Johns Hopkins Pulls BOMBSHELL Article Because It Destroys The Pandemic Narrative

November 26, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

On November 22, 2020 Johns Hopkins Newsletter published an article by Yanni Gu titled A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19. In this article stat experts declared: “These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

Within a few days the powers that be were quick to scrub the article from their website so as to suppress this incredible truth and keep the public believing we are in the midst of a “pandemic.” This is HUGE news that must be shared. Fortunately it can still be found in web archives as follows:

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

By YANNI GU | November 22, 2020  

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September.

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States. 

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared. 

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. 

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. 

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception? 

To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.

Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

“This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand pointed out.

When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND Graph depicts the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018.

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND  Graph depicts the total decrease in deaths by various causes, including COVID-19.  

The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.

In an interview with The News-Letter, Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.

In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes. Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say, in Briand’s view, that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.

Briand also mentioned that more research and data are needed to truly decipher the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States.

Throughout the talk, Briand constantly emphasized that although COVID-19 is a serious national and global problem, she also stressed that society should never lose focus of the bigger picture — death in general. 

The death of a loved one, from COVID-19 or from other causes, is always tragic, Briand explained. Each life is equally important and we should be reminded that even during a global pandemic we should not forget about the tragic loss of lives from other causes.

According to Briand, the over-exaggeration of the COVID-19 death number may be due to the constant emphasis on COVID-19-related deaths and the habitual overlooking of deaths by other natural causes in society. 

During an interview with The News-Letter after the event, Poorna Dharmasena, a master’s candidate in Applied Economics, expressed his opinion about Briand’s concluding remarks.

“At the end of the day, it’s still a deadly virus. And over-exaggeration or not, to a certain degree, is irrelevant,” Dharmasena said.

When asked whether the public should be informed about this exaggeration in death numbers, Dharmasena stated that people have a right to know the truth. However, COVID-19 should still continuously be treated as a deadly disease to safeguard the vulnerable population.

More Bombshell News You Won’t Find In the Mainstream Media!

Breaking News: PCR Test Found Unreliable

17TH NOVEMBER 2020FROM AA

Portuguese Court of Appeal considers PCR tests unreliable and lifts quarantine

Here the judgment can be found. Due to lack of language skills, reference is made to the presentation and interpretation of the judgment on tkp.at , where the tenor is quoted as follows:
acórdão citius.pdf

Portugiesisches Berufungsgericht hält PCR-Tests für unzuverlässig und he…An den PCR Tests, die auf eine Veröffentlichung des deutschen Virologen Christian Drosten zurückzuführen und vom…

 ” Based on the currently available scientific evidence, this test is [the RT-PCR test] in and of itself is not able to unambiguously determine whether the positivity actually corresponds to an infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, for several reasons, two of which are paramount: the reliability of the test depends on the number of cycles used; the reliability of the test depends on the viral load present.

With reference to Jaafar et al. (2020; https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491) the court concludes that “if a person tests positive by PCR, if a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as described in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the likelihood that this person is infected is <3% and the likelihood that the result will be a false positive is 97% “. The court also notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being carried out in Portugal is unknown.

With reference to Surkova et al. (2020; https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30453–7/fulltext ) the court further states that every diagnostic test must be interpreted in the context of the actual probability of illness, as assessed prior to performing the test itself, and expresses the opinion that “In the current epidemiological landscape, the likelihood of Covid-19 tests giving false positive results is increasing, with significant implications for individuals, the health system and society Has”.

The court’s summary for ruling against the regional health authority’s appeal reads as follows:

“Given the scientific doubts expressed by experts, ie, those who play a role, about the reliability of the PCR tests, the lack of information on the analytical parameters of the tests and the lack of a medical diagnosis as to the presence of an infection or an infection risk occupied, this test can never tell if C actually was a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or whether A, B and D were at high risk. ” “

Update : A reader contributed this translation , thank you!

Update: And someone found these sources:

http://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/79d6ba338dcbe5e28025861f003e7b30?OpenDocument

https://tribunal-relacao.vlex.pt/

https://crlisboa.org/wp/juris/processo-n-o1783-20–7t8pdl-l1‑3/

It’s all falling apart. One by one the dominoes will fall and at the end will be freedom for humanity. Never lose hope.

Costco Announces They Intend To Violate Federal Law And Are Happy To Discriminate

November 14, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

“Effective Nov. 16, 2020, we will require all members, guests and employees to wear a face mask or face shield at Costco locations,” Costco’s president and chief executive officer, Craig Jelinek, wrote in a statement yesterday.

A mask requirement has been in place at all Costco stores since May 4. However, those with a medical condition were previously exempt from the rule.

“This [exemption] is no longer the case. If a member has a medical condition that prevents them from wearing a mask, they must wear a face shield at Costco,” Jelinek said.

Apparently Mr. Jelinek doesn’t seem to realize that some of these medical exemptions are for psychological issues that prevent the placement of any type of restrictive device being forced on or around their face.

And apparently he also seems to think he has the authority to violate Federal Laws which protect those with disabilities from being discriminated against, while also ignoring the rules laid out by the Governor. I know in my state our Governor has declared that those with a medical condition are exempt from wearing a face covering. It doesn’t say “unless that face covering is a plastic shield.”

The truth of it is this: medical exemption or not – you do NOT have to wear a face diaper to shop at Costco, or anywhere for that matter!

When you enter into a grocery store or any business and someone asks you where your face mask is ask them why they expect you to wear one. Here are the possible replies and the coinciding answer you should give:

“To prevent the spread of Covid-19 and keep our other customers safe.” To which you respond…

“Can I see the physicians affidavit to confirm that I am in fact a threat to public safety? Unless there is a medical assessment done by a medical professional that has been sworn by affidavit to affirm that I am carrying a communicable disease, and that affidavit has been given to a Health Official who then obtains a court order for me to be isolated, I am not a direct threat.”

“You have to wear one because it’s our store policy.” To which you reply…

“Your store policy cannot override my federally protected rights. You cannot enforce a store policy that is against the LAW.”

“It’s the law.” To which you reply…

“No, actually it’s not the LAW. The LAW is the Constitution, which protects my right to speak freely and obtain LIFE-giving oxygen without obstruction. The LAW is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which outlaws discrimination and allows for equal access to goods and services. There is no LAW which declares I must conceal my identity in order to shop. Can you show me the statute?”

“It’s for your health and safety and the safety of others.” To which you reply…

“Can I see your license to practice medicine? Are you a doctor? Are you my doctor? My doctor has advised against me wearing a mask or anything on my face. Did you know it is against the law to practice medicine without a license?”

When they are unable to answer your questions you then proceed to go about your shopping. If they try to block you from entering, advise them that they are committing a crime known as false imprisonment.

Just the act of harassment alone, even if only verbal, is considered assault. If they lay a finger on you it then becomes battery. Be sure to document the entire experience.

If they refuse to let you pass after advising them of the laws they are breaking you may choose to leave before the police are called but be sure to record the names of those involved and the time of the incident, as well as the details, for later reference.

Now you have a CAUSE OF ACTION for a Civil Complaint. You can then ask a court for an injunction to prevent Costco (or any other store) from violating your rights again or causing you continued harm by drafting and filing a “Complaint for Declaratory and Emergency Injunctive Relief”.

Even if you do NOT engage in any of this dialogue YOU STILL HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION! The moment they refuse you entry even though you are a paying member they have committed the crime of harassment. You can turn around and leave right there and still follow through with the next steps. Be sure to watch the video below!

The only way that we are going to win this fight is if the people get BRAVE, GET EDUCATED and STAND UP! You don’t need a lawyer! You just need motivation. Our future is at stake. It is time to make our legal system work for us! It is time to take back our FREEDOM.

My latest rant on BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Mh1RofaGbvze/

How The CDC Has Created The Illusion of Excess Deaths From Covid-19

November 9, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

It has been eight months since Covid-19 began it’s reign of terror in America, quickly becoming a household name. In order for governments to continue their “mitigation” tactics, relentlessly subverting the will of the people and depriving them of their Constitutional rights, there must be a continued state of emergency in order to justify these draconian policies.

The single most important deciding factor in calling for a continued state of emergency is the PERCEPTION that one exists. How exactly does one determine this state of emergency when hospitals remain operating at normal capacity and evidence of widespread death remains unseen?

By manipulating statistical data to create the illusion of excess death.

Misreporting In The Last Three Years Has Lead to Questionable Estimates

If you look at the data from The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for death totals from 1999-2018 you can see that The CDC reports the total deaths increased in large amounts from 2009 to 2016 and then suddenly stopped increasing in 2018 and 2019.

Underlying Cause of Death, 1999-2018 Results

Data for 2019 is obtainable here (click “Downloads” then “Download data”; the total deaths for 2019 was determined by adding column “K” from rows 119 to 170 which are data for weeks 1-52 of 2019).

That gives you a total of 2,845,796 for 2019.

As you can see 2017, 2018 and 2019 totals are nearly identical which makes no sense considering from 2010 to 2016, the number of deaths increased by 275,813. Given the data on hand one should estimate deaths in the U.S. to increase by 275,000 every six years or so. But suddenly come 2018 that increase completely halts.

Using this incredibly questionable data we arrive at an expected death count for the year 2020 that is actually lower than that for 2019. The CDC has taken the death count from 2017, 2018 and 2019 and added them up to get an average of 2,832,835.

Anything over this number can now be attributed to Covid-19.

According to the data from the CDC found above from 1999 to 2010 the number of deaths per year stayed relatively constant from approximately 2,390,000 to 2,470,000 deaths per year while the total U.S. population increased by about 30 million people.

Since 2010, though, deaths per year have reportedly increased by about 400,000 per year compared to 2009, while up to 2018 the CDC estimated the population only increased by 20 million people. This presents a serious question: is there a huge increase in death in those years or a discrepancy in data collection for total population?

Census takers say they were told to enter false information

In a Fox News article released on November 8, 2020 two census takers told The Associated Press that their supervisors pressured them to enter false information into a computer system about homes they had not visited so they could close cases ahead of their deadline.

Census workers, Pam Roberts of Indiana and Maria Arce of Massachusetts, both blew the whistle on their supervisors and exposed that they were instructed to make up answers about households where no one was home.

The Fox News article reads:

“The census takers shared their experiences with the AP as a coalition of local governments and advocacy groups wages a battle in federal court over the accuracy of the 2020 census. A lawsuit filed in California challenged the decision by the Commerce Department, which oversees the Census Bureau, to speed up deadlines so that the count would end in September.

The coalition argued that the shortened timeline would cause minority communities to be undercounted in the data used to determine the number of congressional seats in each state.

A judge ruled that the count could continue through the end of October and that census officials could continue crunching the numbers through April 2021. But the Trump administration appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sided with the administration and allowed census field operations to end in mid-October. An appellate court suspended the judge’s order on the deadline for the numbers to be used for congressional representation. That issue is still being litigated.”

My theory in all of this is a deliberate skewing of the numbers not only for political purposes but for even more falsified data to be used as we embark on a new year of pandemic hell with the coming Covid-21.

We all know that the CDC has been colluding with The World Health Organization, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank and World Economic Forum to maintain a stranglehold on the world population long enough to roll out the Great Reset, the Digital Dollar and the nanotechnology laced Covid Vaccine for a new world order dystopian surveillance state that the masses will call the “New Normal.”

It’s clear to see how easy it is to maintain control over the perception of the masses when you can control how data is collected and used.

Check out my video on this…

Thanks for subscribing!