Johns Hopkins Pulls BOMBSHELL Article Because It Destroys The Pandemic Narrative

November 26, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

On November 22, 2020 Johns Hopkins Newsletter published an article by Yanni Gu titled A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19. In this article stat experts declared: “These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

Within a few days the powers that be were quick to scrub the article from their website so as to suppress this incredible truth and keep the public believing we are in the midst of a “pandemic.” This is HUGE news that must be shared. Fortunately it can still be found in web archives as follows:

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

By YANNI GU | November 22, 2020  

pasted-image-0

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September.

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States. 

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared. 

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. 

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. 

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception? 

To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.

Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

“This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand pointed out.

When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND Graph depicts the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018.

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND  Graph depicts the total decrease in deaths by various causes, including COVID-19.  

The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.

In an interview with The News-Letter, Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.

In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes. Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say, in Briand’s view, that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.

Briand also mentioned that more research and data are needed to truly decipher the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States.

Throughout the talk, Briand constantly emphasized that although COVID-19 is a serious national and global problem, she also stressed that society should never lose focus of the bigger picture — death in general. 

The death of a loved one, from COVID-19 or from other causes, is always tragic, Briand explained. Each life is equally important and we should be reminded that even during a global pandemic we should not forget about the tragic loss of lives from other causes.

According to Briand, the over-exaggeration of the COVID-19 death number may be due to the constant emphasis on COVID-19-related deaths and the habitual overlooking of deaths by other natural causes in society. 

During an interview with The News-Letter after the event, Poorna Dharmasena, a master’s candidate in Applied Economics, expressed his opinion about Briand’s concluding remarks.

“At the end of the day, it’s still a deadly virus. And over-exaggeration or not, to a certain degree, is irrelevant,” Dharmasena said.

When asked whether the public should be informed about this exaggeration in death numbers, Dharmasena stated that people have a right to know the truth. However, COVID-19 should still continuously be treated as a deadly disease to safeguard the vulnerable population.

More Bombshell News You Won’t Find In the Mainstream Media!

How The CDC Has Created The Illusion of Excess Deaths From Covid-19

November 9, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

It has been eight months since Covid-19 began it’s reign of terror in America, quickly becoming a household name. In order for governments to continue their “mitigation” tactics, relentlessly subverting the will of the people and depriving them of their Constitutional rights, there must be a continued state of emergency in order to justify these draconian policies.

The single most important deciding factor in calling for a continued state of emergency is the PERCEPTION that one exists. How exactly does one determine this state of emergency when hospitals remain operating at normal capacity and evidence of widespread death remains unseen?

By manipulating statistical data to create the illusion of excess death.

Misreporting In The Last Three Years Has Lead to Questionable Estimates

If you look at the data from The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for death totals from 1999-2018 you can see that The CDC reports the total deaths increased in large amounts from 2009 to 2016 and then suddenly stopped increasing in 2018 and 2019.

Underlying Cause of Death, 1999-2018 Results

Data for 2019 is obtainable here (click “Downloads” then “Download data”; the total deaths for 2019 was determined by adding column “K” from rows 119 to 170 which are data for weeks 1-52 of 2019).

That gives you a total of 2,845,796 for 2019.

As you can see 2017, 2018 and 2019 totals are nearly identical which makes no sense considering from 2010 to 2016, the number of deaths increased by 275,813. Given the data on hand one should estimate deaths in the U.S. to increase by 275,000 every six years or so. But suddenly come 2018 that increase completely halts.

Using this incredibly questionable data we arrive at an expected death count for the year 2020 that is actually lower than that for 2019. The CDC has taken the death count from 2017, 2018 and 2019 and added them up to get an average of 2,832,835.

Anything over this number can now be attributed to Covid-19.

According to the data from the CDC found above from 1999 to 2010 the number of deaths per year stayed relatively constant from approximately 2,390,000 to 2,470,000 deaths per year while the total U.S. population increased by about 30 million people.

Since 2010, though, deaths per year have reportedly increased by about 400,000 per year compared to 2009, while up to 2018 the CDC estimated the population only increased by 20 million people. This presents a serious question: is there a huge increase in death in those years or a discrepancy in data collection for total population?

Census takers say they were told to enter false information

In a Fox News article released on November 8, 2020 two census takers told The Associated Press that their supervisors pressured them to enter false information into a computer system about homes they had not visited so they could close cases ahead of their deadline.

Census workers, Pam Roberts of Indiana and Maria Arce of Massachusetts, both blew the whistle on their supervisors and exposed that they were instructed to make up answers about households where no one was home.

The Fox News article reads:

“The census takers shared their experiences with the AP as a coalition of local governments and advocacy groups wages a battle in federal court over the accuracy of the 2020 census. A lawsuit filed in California challenged the decision by the Commerce Department, which oversees the Census Bureau, to speed up deadlines so that the count would end in September.

The coalition argued that the shortened timeline would cause minority communities to be undercounted in the data used to determine the number of congressional seats in each state.

A judge ruled that the count could continue through the end of October and that census officials could continue crunching the numbers through April 2021. But the Trump administration appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sided with the administration and allowed census field operations to end in mid-October. An appellate court suspended the judge’s order on the deadline for the numbers to be used for congressional representation. That issue is still being litigated.”

My theory in all of this is a deliberate skewing of the numbers not only for political purposes but for even more falsified data to be used as we embark on a new year of pandemic hell with the coming Covid-21.

We all know that the CDC has been colluding with The World Health Organization, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank and World Economic Forum to maintain a stranglehold on the world population long enough to roll out the Great Reset, the Digital Dollar and the nanotechnology laced Covid Vaccine for a new world order dystopian surveillance state that the masses will call the “New Normal.”

It’s clear to see how easy it is to maintain control over the perception of the masses when you can control how data is collected and used.

Check out my video on this…

Thanks for subscribing!

Dr. Fauci’s Own Words Destroy The COVID-19 Narrative

November 7, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Listen to the EXPERTS!

Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), has been touted as one of the leading experts concerning the coronavirus pandemic, and has stood at the forefront of Covid-19 policy in America, yet this very same expert is also the same guy who has directly contradicted his own stance on more than one occasion.

Experts have known Covid-19 is not a pandemic since February, 2020

While lay people, politicians, and judges have been left helpless and at the mercy of health experts claiming “we just don’t know enough” during the first lockdown phase of Covid-19 disease, we are too far along now and have learned more than enough about the Covid-19 disease to allow the same set of health experts to hoodwink us into a second round of unjustified  rights violations. 

Based on preliminary data out of China, as early as February, 2020, public health officials Anthony Fauci and Robert Redfield, heads of the NIAID and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), respectively, and current members of the Presidential Task Force on Coronavirus, acknowledged that Covid-19 was probably not as deadly of a virus as first thought and may end up being close to the seasonal flu in number of deaths and number of people infected (scientists use these two numbers — number of deaths and number of people infected — to calculate something called the “mortality rate” or “case fatality rate” of a virus, which is the single most important number in determining whether a virus qualifies as a public health emergency). 

On February 28, 2020, Fauci and Redfield wrote in an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine:  

“The case fatality rate (of Covid-19) may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”

Neither Fauci nor Redfield have retracted nor modified this prediction about Covid-19 in any official manner since February, 2020, and most scientific data since the publication of this article have verified that Covid-19 is akin to the seasonal flu in mortality rate. 

There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci told 60 Minutes on March 8, 2020.

In an interview with Dr. Jon LaPook on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Dr. Fauci claimed that people should not be wearing a mask unless you are infected, yet later on he was quoted as saying that “everyone” must wear a mask to slow the spread of coronavirus and that state and local leaders should be “as forceful as possible” to get the public to wear masks.

So, which is it Mr. Expert? Seems like that depends on what direction the agenda is heading.

Bombshell: Fauci States COVID Test Has Fatal Flaw

In a July 16, 2020 podcast called “This Week in Virology” Dr. Anthony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID-19 test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Starting at about the 4-minute mark Dr. Fauci says:

“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more… the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule… you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

What Fauci failed to say in the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles and not 35.

Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud.

Page 35

When your country’s leading health expert can’t even keep his story straight it’s safe to say that it’s probably time to start looking elsewhere for answers. Let’s not forget that Anthony Fauci also has a vested interest in the coming vaccine campaign and holds a position on the Global Vaccine Action Plan developed by none other than Bill and Melinda Gates. Read my previous article Covid-19 Is The Litmus Test to learn more about the truth about Covid-19 and those behind the deception.

CATALYST 2030 ~ “SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS” AT THE HEART OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

October 18, 2020 – By Levana Lomma

According to the World Economic Forum (WEF), “The only acceptable response to such a crisis [as Covid-19] is to pursue a “Great Reset” of our economies, politics, and societies.” Makes sense, right?

Of course not, but this is the truth about this manufactured pandemic: It is nothing more than a catalyst for the New World Order. If you are still on the train of thought that the New World Order is just a right-wing conspiracy theory, maybe it’s time you get yourself acquainted with something called the INTERNET. It is a useful tool for those who are willing to look further than the typical “fact checked” mainstream, government approved discourse.

Founder and Executive Chairman of the WEF, Klaus Schwab says in an article found here, “We must rethink what we mean by “capital” in its many iterations, whether financial, environmental, social, or human.  Today’s consumers do not want more and better goods and services for a reasonable price. Rather, they increasingly expect companies to contribute to social welfare and the common good. There is both a fundamental need and an increasingly widespread demand for a new kind of “capitalism.”

That new kind of capitalism is one that places all the wealth and power in the hands of corporations and breeds an ever increasing dependence on government by removing the middle class. Because who doesn’t love the idea of equality? We can all be equal slaves to a system that seeks to track our every move and ensure our subservience. Essentially it is socialism, and the goal of socialism is communism.

He goes on to say, “If the COVID crisis has shown us anything, it is that governments, businesses, or civil-society groups acting alone cannot meet systemic global challenges. We need to break down the siloes that keep these domains separate, and start to build institutional platforms for public-private cooperation.”

Continued mention of the global climate change crisis and the dire need to accelerate the United Nations 2030 Goals for Sustainable Development permeate every article written by WEF. The underlying theme behind the Great Reset as well as Agenda 2030 is the need for unilateral action among nations under centralized management, also known as Global Governance (a New World Order).

In January of 2020, right at the outset of the declaration of this so called “pandemic” a group of affluent “social entrepreneurs” under the wing of the Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship (a sister organization to the WEF) released a 91 page document called Catalyst 2030 – Getting from crisis to systems change.

This document is a blue print which explains how these “social entrepreneurs” who are hand picked by the Schwab Foundation act as a primary contact among the highest level of leadership, in the most powerful organizations, to ensure the adoption of the philosophy around the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). The document mentions how “social entrepreneurs” play the role of honest broker, seen as trustworthy, with little to gain personally, and thus able to help develop partnerships in good faith.

Catalyst 2030 page 10

The document outlines 4 Recommendations being presented as a means of catalyzing the the 17 Sustainable Development Goals into high gear to ensure success by the year 2030. The recommendations are as follows:

  1. World leaders must commit to systems change.
  2. Social entrepreneurs should have a seat at the decision-making table.
  3. Governments and other major institutions should create high-level one stop points of contact for social entrepreneurs.
  4. Governments, companies, philanthropists and others must transform how they finance the ideas of social entrepreneurs.

Sounds great of course, if you are one of the vast majority of the population who has bought into the fear mongering propaganda around supposed man-made climate change. But if you have spent any time researching further into exactly what the SDG’s are calling for you would understand there is a much bigger, sinister agenda in the shadows. An agenda to restructure education, remove rights to private property and access to resources, to move all of the people into tightly packed city centers operated through the smart grid, to remove private transport and instead get everyone on public railways, and ultimately to remove all sovereignty, all freedoms and all autonomy.

And it appears these people known as “social entrepreneurs” are taking on the role as reeducation advocates to infiltrate the highest levels of the government and private sector hierarchy to create a unified methodology for total control.

The document goes into great detail about the plans to reshape the system involving everything from education and food security, to digital transformation and a transformation to tourism. Mind you, these are all concepts and initiatives planned out for many a day prior to the “surprise outbreak” known as Covid-19. The worldly powers knew that in order to execute a plan of such magnitude they would need a good crisis. The people would never have willingly closed their businesses and allowed their basic fundamental rights and freedoms to be trampled on as a means of resetting the way the world functions without the belief in the existence of a “global crisis”.

The most disturbing aspect of it all is the fact that acquiescence to this agenda was achieved with nothing more than words delivered through the media propaganda box. The hospitals have never once been overwhelmed and we still see no extraordinary excess death. The infection fatality rate remains parallel to a bad seasonal flu. All of then statistical data in the world is useless when the vast majority are under hypnosis through the television. As long ads the idiot box tells them to be afraid, they will obey.

Watch my take on all of this at Somebody Had To Say It on BitChute:

Please subscribe!

Rockefeller Foundation is Infiltrating Local Government to Promote a Massive COVID-19 Testing Campaign

On April 20, 2020 the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University released a report called “Roadmap to Pandemic Resilience” with support from the Rockefeller Foundation. In this report they outline a plan of action that involves widespread testing, tracing and supported isolation to safely get the economy functioning again. It calls for an authoritarian style centralized management approach that involves infiltrating local governments to engage in “educating” state and county health experts and other government officials to ensure the goals for testing are met.

“Road Map to Pandemic Resilience ~ Testing, Tracing and Supported Isolation” EDMOND J. SAFRA CENTER FOR ETHICS AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY with support from The Rockefeller Foundation

The roadmap to resiliency will be headed up by the Rockefeller Foundation’s National Covid-19 Testing & Tracing Action Plan, that has launched an initiative with a goal to increase testing capacity to 30 million tests per week by the fall. We are now in the fall months and it’s safe to say that they seem to be on par.

At the top is the “Pandemic Testing Board (PTB), akin to the War Production Board that the United States created in World War II.” The Pandemic Testing Board would “consist of leaders from business, government and academia” who will be tasked with maintaining alignment among local government officials in all participating cities. This Supreme Council would have the power to decide productions and services with an authority similar to that conferred to the President of the United States in wartime by the Defense Production Act.

For each test, “a fair market reimbursement (e.g. $100) for all Covid-19 assays” is expected. Thus, billions of dollars a month of public money will be needed.

The Rockefeller Foundation and its financial partners will help create a network for the provision of credit guarantees and the signing of contracts with suppliers, that is large companies that manufacture drugs and medical equipment.

According to the Plan, the “Pandemic Control Council” is also authorized to create a “Pandemic Response Corps”: a special force with a staff of 100 to 300 thousand components. They would be recruited among Peace Corps and Americorps volunteers (officially created by the US government to “help developing countries”) and among National Guard military personnel. The members of the “Pandemic Response Corps” would receive an average gross wage of $40,000 per year, a State expenditure of  $4-12 billion a year is expected for it.

The “pandemic response body” would above all have the task of controlling the population with military-like techniques, through digital tracking and identification systems, in work and study places, in residential areas, in public places and when travelling. Systems of this type – the Rockefeller Foundation recalls – are made by Apple, Google and Facebook.

According to the Plan, information on individuals relating to their state of health and their activities would remain confidential “whenever possible”. However, they would all be centralized in a digital platform co-managed by the Federal State and private companies. According to data provided by the “Pandemic Control Council”, it would be decided from time to time which area should be subject to lockdown and for how long.

All of this effort, organization and money just to combat a virus with a mortality rate parallel to the flu? No, there is obviously much more going on here. This is no temporary infrastructure being erected. I guarantee you these militaristic efforts to track and trace will live on far beyond the life of this “pandemic”.

The only thing holding the illusion of a pandemic together is widespread testing for false positives. This initiative will help to funnel billions of dollars into the pockets of the global elite through a system which promotes testing in schools, health care facilities, workplaces deemed essential and of course for intra and interstate travel. This method of mandatory testing to gain clearance to participate in society is projected to continue for years on end and at no time will it ever be considered anything less than a complete violation to our fundamental rights. Just how long can our governments get away with infringing upon our civil liberties in the absence of any solid evidence that an actual emergency really exists?

Watch my latest video on this topic where I also uncover the connection Hawai’i has to the Rockefeller Foundation’s National Action Plan through Honolulu’s commitment as one of the 100 Resilient Cities:

Please visit my BitChute Channel and subscribe!